: : : : AMD FX 8350 Black Edition CPU and Wraith Cooler Review

AMD FX 8350 Black Edition CPU and Wraith Cooler Review - PAGE 1

- Thursday, May 12th, 2016 Like Share


Article Index

1.Introduction & Closer Look
2.Testing & Conclusion
Get updates when we publish new articles
 

Sort by date: ascending descending
1 thumbs!
^
Seekmore May 13, 16
AMD FX 8350 costs less compared to its equivalent Intel CPUs. Being a specially designed gaming CPU based on Vishera architecture, the CPU saves your money as its annual home energy cost will be approximately US$56 per year. You can find out more details on http://www.comparecpus.com/ControlPanel/FullProductView.aspx . As you stated it supports only DDR3 memory. But gives a good performance as tests indicate. '9068' is a pretty good score for its benchmark tests.
0 thumbs!
^
jaxative May 13, 16
That's total BS on saving power. The 8350 has a TDP of 125W versus an Intel 15 6500 that has a TDP of 65W.

The 8350 is produced on a 32nm process whilst the 6500 is 14nm thus allowing it to run cooler and consume significantly less power.

Sure the AMD chip is a decent performer at it's price and can seem quite good if you overclock it to within an inch of it's life but you won't be OCing much with this cooler and if you do crank the speed significantly then you increase the power load to match.

The 8350 was launched in 2012 after all and hasn't magically gotten any faster since then.
1 thumbs!
^
Netwolf May 16, 16
Although I agree that Intel's are more efficient. CPUs don't run at full power all the time. I believe the MAX TDP of 125W is headroom for overclocking. Unless you are folding 24/7.

Also the smaller process doesn't mean it will run cooler. I only means that one can fit more transistors on a die. The issue changes from total heat to how to dissipate the heat from tiny a source. The easiest way to do that, is to use less energy. Exactly what Intel has done.
Sort by date: ascending descending
(0.0730/d/www1)