Neoseeker : News : A supercomputer for only $2,500 (USD)
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Tue, Nov 18
Mon, Nov 17
Sun, Nov 16
Sat, Nov 15
Fri, Nov 14
Thu, Nov 13

send article hardware newsletter   article comments (10)

A supercomputer for only $2,500 (USD)
Kevin Spiess - Friday, August 31st, 2007 | 11:10AM (PT)


Designers of Cray-2 aggravated

Anyone who has ever touched a computer a with 10-foot pole (or shorter) knows that the price of computational power falls fast. And this has once again been proven this weekend by a grad student and professor from Calvin College: together, they built a desktop sized supercomputer from off-the-shelf parts, for just under $2,500.

The design is somewhat reminsecent of a clubhouse sandwich:

The supercomputer's name is Microwulf. It is a variety of 'Beowulf cluster.' Cluster meaning a networked computers running in parallel; and Beowul denoting a cluster that is a "homemade, cost-effective" solution that "liberates researchers from expensive commercial options for super-computing, much like Beowulf of the Old English poem liberated the Danes from the tyrannical rule of Grendel." 

The hardware involved includes four MSI K6N6PGM-F motherboards, four Athlon 64 X2 3800+ AM2 CPUs, 8 sticks of Kingston DDR2-667 RAM, four PCI-E Intel network adaptors, and some Zalman case fans and a single 250 GB Seagate SATA HD. 

As for the software: They chose open-source distro-darling, Ubuntu Linux.   

For a price-tag of $2,470 USD, the Microwulf's performance is rated at 26.25 Gflops ( [10^9] floating-point-operations-per-second). In comparison, only 10 years ago, IBM's chess Grand Master-squashing Deep Blue supercomputer was built, at a cost of somewhere around the neighborhood of $5 million dollars, and its performance was rated at 11.38 Gflops.

  Related Stories

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

August 31st, 2007 11:47AM(PT)
duffbeer
"Supercomputer"?

I'd like to see this "supercomputer" up against a system with 1 or 2 Intel Penryn Yorkfield Quad core processors, or against a system with just 1 Intel Nehalem 8 core processor (Quarter 4, 2008).

A Sony PSP could be considered a "supercomputer" by 1980 standards.

I think I read somewhere Nvidia's G92 (November 2007) could be capable of 1 teriflops performance.
August 31st, 2007 1:14PM(PT)
iamjoe56
lol. this thing does rate up their, no mistake, and besides, I am not sure their is a way to get the full performance out of a multi-core CPU yet (Might be wrong). Anyways. if you want to compare it to something, put it up against a cray.
August 31st, 2007 1:42PM(PT)
kspiess
duffbeer: Supercomputer is a bit of a misnomer in the article. Supercomputer is used here because of the cluster aspect of this setup.

But in regards to your comments, it's not really fair to judge this computer against cpus /gpus that have not yet been released, because 'supercomputer' is a relative term -- that is to say, it's not as important how much performance the supercomputer offers, its more important to how much performance it offers in comparison to other computers available at that particular moment in time.

The comp. sci. grad student who worked on this was quoted as saying: "“So far as we can tell, this is the first supercomputer to have this low price/performance ratio—the first to cost less than $100/Gflop."
August 31st, 2007 2:10PM(PT)
kspiess
Oh, and for more reference, the worlds fastest supercomputer, Blue Gene, is rated at 360 TFLOPS.
August 31st, 2007 3:33PM(PT)
PokeSplicer
I sound like an idiot comapre to you guys, but
ZOMG WE HAV T3H S00PA C0MPZ!!! T3Y AM G01N TO BC0M3 FR33 S00N!!!
I represent the stupider population.
August 31st, 2007 4:58PM(PT)
Sort
duffbeer: With the hardware you are referring to, it would be nowhere in the ballpark of $2500 either.

I think the main idea of this snippet is that a cheap machine is pulling substantial power.
August 31st, 2007 9:16PM(PT)
The Slayer
They had an update on their site earlyer:

"Update: As of Aug 1, 2007, Microwulf can be built for $1256"

Damn, I just built my computer and it cost a little more then that with a quad core intel processor...
September 1st, 2007 11:14AM(PT)
kspiess
^^ thanks for that -- I didn't think to check the prices of that hardware to current prices. That is quite the machine for $1256.
September 1st, 2007 11:19AM(PT)
tallteen86
Would this sort of setup be good for games though (with the inclusion of a very good Video Card)?

Or just hardcore number crunching, for like, research and stuff?
September 2nd, 2007 10:37AM(PT)
iamjoe56
it would be good for games, though you'd ahve to modify it pretty far to get their. It is designed to caculate, and run types of software (Like military testing software). That kind of stuff would run a computer into the ground, because of the HUGE amount of algorithmic data involved. Their is an Algorithem for simulating water, another for simulating a material, and so on. No doubt it could play a game very well, with that kind of firepower, but it would have to be made around that purpose, not just software execution.

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0659/d/nova)