Neoseeker : News : Active Armor Processor Usage Issue Resolved
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Sun, Oct 12
Sat, Oct 11
Fri, Oct 10
Thu, Oct 09
Wed, Oct 08

send article hardware newsletter   article comments (1)

Active Armor Processor Usage Issue Resolved
Terren Tong - Thursday, March 3rd, 2005 | 9:14PM (PT)


Interrupt conflict between IDE driver and Network driver identified as problem

When we did our reviews of the Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI board and DFI's LanParty UT nF4 Ultra-D boards we noticed unusually high processor usage when testing the integrated network card on the nForce 4 chipset.  Perplexed we contacted NVIDIA about this issue and we have spent a couple weeks on trying to identify and resolve this issue with them and we finally have an answer now. It turns out that the IDE driver and the network driver are sharing the same interrupt and this was causing some issues with Active Armor - we have a couple work arounds from NVIDIA. Here's a copy/paste of the correspondence:

1- Remove the NVIDIA IDE driver and use the Microsoft IDE driver. Once that is done, ActiveArmor works again as intended. CPU utilization drops from about 40% to 20%.

2- Unplug the SATA drive and try different ports on the motherboard, keep enabling and disabling the IDE driver till you come to a state where the IDE driver and the network driver don't share the same interrupt... Once that is done, ActiveArmor works as intended.

NVIDIA is looking for a better solution right now and have both their BIOS and IDE teams working on it to find a permanent fix.  This may be vendor specific BIOS problem as it does not show up on the NVIDIA reference solution but since we have a limited number of consumer boards on hand at the moment we cannot verify this.  Big thanks to the guys over at NVIDIA as they were very persistent and have spent countless hours on the phone with us in trying to resolve this! 

Source: none

Section: Networking, Motherboards & Chipsets

  Related Stories

  Related Reviews & Articles

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

March 4th, 2005 1:55AM(PT)
tomchu
Good work on both NVIDIA's part and your own. I heard you on the with them for hours -- both of you showed great patience.

Just a question, though ... wasn't ACPI supposed to completely eliminate all the IRQ-sharing funkiness through the use OS-controlled IRQs?

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0384/d/ascension)