Neoseeker : News : Comcast's bandwidth cap impending
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Tue, Nov 18
Mon, Nov 17
Sun, Nov 16
Sat, Nov 15
Fri, Nov 14
Thu, Nov 13

send article   article comments (11)

Comcast's bandwidth cap impending
Sean Ridgeley - Friday, August 29th, 2008 | 8:58AM (PT)


The beginning of the end?

Well, the FCC may have put down the gavel against Comcast BitTorrent throttling last month, but it isn't all good news for customers -- the ISP has announced it will limit its cable internet bandwidth for homes to 250GB per month starting October 1.

Now, this won't be a big deal for most internet users (Comcast claims median high-speed users consume 2 to 3GB/mo.), but for gamer folk who sometimes use lots of bandwidth for say, digital distribution services like GamersGate, iTunes, Netflix, Xbox Live, and/or the PlayStation Network, this could be a problem. Of course, if you're downloading 250GB+ of data each month, you might want to consider going outside and stuff instead.

No charge is planned for exceeding the cap, but repeat offenders will have their accounts terminated. This seems at least slightly illogical -- if you're going to limit users, you should give them the option to pay to go over that limit, right? I'm assuming money is the only real thing at stake here, this being a business and all. Sounds like an infringement on freedom to me. I suppose they're making it a take it or leave it situation.

In any case, the greater worry among customers is Comcast will gradually lower this bar, using 250GB as a generous starting point (before the slow but sure descent into hell); other large cable providers like Time Warner and Cox Communications are currently testing caps as low as 5GB. The Internet is getting a scary place to be, friends.


Comcast's bandwidth cap impending Image 1

Source: shacknews

Section: Internet Related

  Related Stories

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

August 29th, 2008 10:26AM(PT)
kspiess
250GB sounds pretty good to me. With my current provider, Shaw, my cap here in Vancouver is 60GB. It's like an extra $10 a month to go to 80GB, I believe.
August 29th, 2008 11:20AM(PT)
Sabre 220
I would kill for 250GB per month to be honest. I stuck on 20Gb per month with BT here in the UK, but I do think they'll lower it as 250GB is abit high, and I don't even know how to use that much in a month.
August 29th, 2008 12:56PM(PT)
jim
SO - if I use Vonage, what kind of bandwidth is that? If I like to watch tv shows on ABC - how much bandwidth is that?
August 29th, 2008 2:01PM(PT)
THM
Well, 250GB is really generous, I suppose.
In Australia, most of the homes get only 3GB per month!!!!
August 29th, 2008 2:08PM(PT)
OmegaFury
Can I hear what will happen in layman's terms? Because I don't know much about bandwidth or how it will effect me if it is lowered.
August 29th, 2008 2:50PM(PT)
chautemoc
Basically, you would only be able to download 250GB of stuff or less, per month.
August 29th, 2008 4:41PM(PT)
OmegaFury
Oh. What was the cap before? Or was it unlimited?
August 29th, 2008 5:11PM(PT)
x_revenge
holy clocks for once i'm happy to be using the provider i use where there are no limits and stuff, well, the speed rarely gets higher than 500 kb (only with bittorent which is logical really, which site would give half a mb of its bandwith to just you unless you pay for membership?)
but i can't complain, 500kb is more than enough to keep me happy, i don't even understand why people want more, i didn't need 16mbps in the first place, my first connection was 768kbps, and it had a dynamic ip, this one is freakin' static and i hate it, if some site bans you you're screwed like this...anyway, getting kinda out of topic
August 29th, 2008 8:21PM(PT)
Skyhawk
Here is an interesting comment from wired.com that I thought was interesting"

"In Japan, which boasts one of the most advanced fiber-optic broadband markets in the world, one carrier recently implemented a usage cap, but it was 30 GB per day -- roughly an-eighth of Comcast's total monthly cap."
August 30th, 2008 3:53PM(PT)
GG2K5
While I would be against any bandwidth cap (except for 768KiloBytes every second), I feel personally that 250GB is rather low. There are high bandwidth users, and excessive bandwitdh users. The previous "invisible" cap was set at 600GB, which is plenty for most high bandwidth users. There are VERY few people who without trying to be jackasses and maxxing out their connection simply to do it who use more than 600GB a month, there are LOTS of people who use more than 250GB a month (myself included), who genuinely utilize it, not just take up a bunch of bandwidth.

The thing which is really annoying about this though is that you can not offer to pay for a higher cap. I'd prefer to just pay $86/month (that's double), get 12Mbits/1Mbit, and a 500GB cap (basicly just get two subscriptions to the same house) but no, I can't do that. In all these other ISPs which do this, you can pay to have that limit raised, Comcast, nope!
August 30th, 2008 7:20PM(PT)
tallteen86
250GB seems like a lot to most people (myself included), but I can see some people using that much.

That said, Rogers High-Speed Lite (256KB I think I have) has a 60GB a month limit, and I've exceeded it a couple of times >_>

I remember once, with Sympatico High-Speed DSL (about the same KB cap for speed), well, it had a 20GB/month cap I think, and I exceeded it a lot. And HOLY HELL, My dad got like, a $200 bill once.....That was crazy >_>

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0233/mc/nova)