Neoseeker : News : Comcast's bandwidth cap impending
Neo on: RSS
  • 0 thumbs!
    kspiess Aug 29, 08
    250GB sounds pretty good to me. With my current provider, Shaw, my cap here in Vancouver is 60GB. It's like an extra $10 a month to go to 80GB, I believe.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Sabre Aug 29, 08
    I would kill for 250GB per month to be honest. I stuck on 20Gb per month with BT here in the UK, but I do think they'll lower it as 250GB is abit high, and I don't even know how to use that much in a month.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Guest Aug 29, 08
    SO - if I use Vonage, what kind of bandwidth is that? If I like to watch tv shows on ABC - how much bandwidth is that?
  • 0 thumbs!
    THM Aug 29, 08
    Well, 250GB is really generous, I suppose.
    In Australia, most of the homes get only 3GB per month!!!!
  • 0 thumbs!
    OmegaFury Aug 29, 08
    Can I hear what will happen in layman's terms? Because I don't know much about bandwidth or how it will effect me if it is lowered.
  • Staff
    0 thumbs!
    chautemoc Aug 29, 08
    Basically, you would only be able to download 250GB of stuff or less, per month.
  • 0 thumbs!
    OmegaFury Aug 30, 08
    Oh. What was the cap before? Or was it unlimited?
  • 0 thumbs!
    x_revenge Aug 30, 08
    holy clocks for once i'm happy to be using the provider i use where there are no limits and stuff, well, the speed rarely gets higher than 500 kb (only with bittorent which is logical really, which site would give half a mb of its bandwith to just you unless you pay for membership?)
    but i can't complain, 500kb is more than enough to keep me happy, i don't even understand why people want more, i didn't need 16mbps in the first place, my first connection was 768kbps, and it had a dynamic ip, this one is freakin' static and i hate it, if some site bans you you're screwed like this...anyway, getting kinda out of topic
  • 0 thumbs!
    Guest Aug 30, 08
    Here is an interesting comment from wired.com that I thought was interesting"

    "In Japan, which boasts one of the most advanced fiber-optic broadband markets in the world, one carrier recently implemented a usage cap, but it was 30 GB per day -- roughly an-eighth of Comcast's total monthly cap."
  • 0 thumbs!
    GG2K5 Aug 31, 08
    While I would be against any bandwidth cap (except for 768KiloBytes every second), I feel personally that 250GB is rather low. There are high bandwidth users, and excessive bandwitdh users. The previous "invisible" cap was set at 600GB, which is plenty for most high bandwidth users. There are VERY few people who without trying to be jackasses and maxxing out their connection simply to do it who use more than 600GB a month, there are LOTS of people who use more than 250GB a month (myself included), who genuinely utilize it, not just take up a bunch of bandwidth.

    The thing which is really annoying about this though is that you can not offer to pay for a higher cap. I'd prefer to just pay $86/month (that's double), get 12Mbits/1Mbit, and a 500GB cap (basicly just get two subscriptions to the same house) but no, I can't do that. In all these other ISPs which do this, you can pay to have that limit raised, Comcast, nope!
  • 0 thumbs!
    Shadow of Death Aug 31, 08
    250GB seems like a lot to most people (myself included), but I can see some people using that much.

    That said, Rogers High-Speed Lite (256KB I think I have) has a 60GB a month limit, and I've exceeded it a couple of times >_>

    I remember once, with Sympatico High-Speed DSL (about the same KB cap for speed), well, it had a 20GB/month cap I think, and I exceeded it a lot. And HOLY HELL, My dad got like, a $200 bill once.....That was crazy >_>
- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

Hardware Newsletter:
Email:


Hardware Price Check

Compare Prices

Motherboards
ASUS
Gigabyte
MSI
eVGA
Intel
Tyan
More...

Processors
AMD
Intel
More...

Memory
DDR
DDR2
DDR3
More...

Video Cards
ATI
eVGA
XFX
Sapphire
PNY
More...

search for lowest prices
(0.3074/d/web0)