Neoseeker : News : New York passes video game bill into law
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Tue, Nov 18
Mon, Nov 17
Sun, Nov 16
Sat, Nov 15
Fri, Nov 14
Thu, Nov 13

send article   article comments (7)

New York passes video game bill into law
Lydia Sung - Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 | 9:43AM (PT)


ESA not happy with governor's signing

New York passes video game bill into law Image 1

In June we heard that the New York State Senate was working on new legislation to better regulate console video game content.  Turns out, Proposition A11717 was signed into law last night by Governor David Paterson.

Paterson issued a statement in a press release, which GamePolitics has acquired a copy of:

"Governor David A. Paterson signed a package of bills, many of which are focused on public safety and protecting the rights of New York residents. [One of these will] ensure the State will explore the negative effects of violent video games.

'We have the obligation to be constantly vigilant about amending our laws to protect the residents of New York State. Many of these bills will do just that by closing loopholes or creating new laws to enhance the quality of life for all New Yorkers,' said Governor Paterson...

...A.11717 / S.6401-A [the video game bill] establishes an advisory council to conduct a study on the connection between interactive media and real-life violence in minors exposed to such media. This bill will also require new video game consoles to have parental lockout features by 2010, and mandate that games sold at retail disclose the ratings obtained from the gaming industry's voluntary rating system."

Previously, the ESA had been urging members of its Video Game Voters Network to oppose the bill.  As we first reported last month, A11717 is comprised of three major parts: parental control on new consoles, the establishment of a 16-member video game advisory board, and game packaging that displays ESRB ratings. 

At the time, we thought the bill would not go through because two of the three components listed already exist (cue skepticism), leaving only the advisory board.  As it turns out, two of the sixteen seats have already been promised to the ESA and EMA, respectively, so that the video game industry and its retailers are not without say.

Still, any video game law tends to annoy the ESA.  VP Richard Taylor expressed as much in a comment to GamePolitics:

"The state has ignored legal precedent, common sense and the wishes of many New Yorkers in enacting this unnecessary bill. This government intrusion will cost taxpayers money and impose unconstitutional mandates for activities and technologies that are already voluntarily in place. It also unfairly singles out the videogame industry over all other forms of media. One wonders where this overreach by government in New York will end. If New York lawmakers feel it is the role of government to convene a government commission on game content, they could next turn to other content such as books, theater and film."

No word of whether or not the ESA will be filing a court complaint -- as is their usual course of action when video game laws come to pass.

Section: Announcements

  Related Stories

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

July 22nd, 2008 10:26AM(PT)
OmegaFury
Is 2008 the year where everyone comes together and blames their problems on video games?
July 22nd, 2008 10:28AM(PT)
RabidChinaGirl
Jack Tretton thinks 2008 is the year of the PlayStation 3. Guess someone should inform him otherwise.
July 22nd, 2008 10:55AM(PT)
VeGiTAX2
It's one of those things where they can pat themselves on the back after, saying they got the game companies to produce ratings on packaging and enabled parental control even though gamers know it's a bunch of garbage.

The clueless fools are who they want to acquire, they want them to clap and cheer about their success for sticking it to the industry because they were never going to actually invest time to find out if any of it existed prior.

Unfortunately in politics having a shred of a clue isn't a requirement, even researching their topics isn't a pre-req. They simply need to make blanket statements about the horrors of video games and be done with it.
July 22nd, 2008 2:40PM(PT)
x_revenge
people don't have to wait for video games to tell them to walk the wrong path and i doubt anyone takes video games as seriously as life...and besides, everyone knows not to repeat in real life what you see in fiction (however this reminds me of a story i once heard about some little kid watching superman on tv then jumping down the roof thinking he could fly...obviously, he could not)
violence, evil and madmen existed long before video games so what gives? if someone started taking drugs, people usually blame him or the dealers but no one blames the ones who grow these things or even the boy's/girl's parents for not taking enough care of him/her
the problem here isn't playing the video game, its how people have learned to understand violence or everything they see and parents have a role too you know, what the goverments around the world do to stop little kids playing violent games should be what parents do, however a teenager (maybe even smaller than that it depends on the person) has all the knowledge and skill needed to understand what is good and what is right, if they behave like morons or are bullies (etc.) its not because they're playing too much gta, (although as i said, if there is no one there to put it at a limit things could turn out worse, there were some guys in my school who liked to play "smackdown vs raw"...only the were doing it in the real world...) its because thats how he grew up, it could be his family, it could be he spent time with the wrong kind of people or it could even be that he watched the news too much, people treat life more seriously than video games duh...and of course they are influenced by it that much more, you can't blame video games for everything but almost all people doing that just want a quick excuse...if video games generated violence then why not make attorneys use that excuse in court
[court in session]
judge: what do you have to say about that Mr. Lame?
David A. Paterson (his lawyer): You can't really blame my client for this...bad situation...sir, it's not his fault for murdering 6 people, shop lifting, extrortion, and cat mutilation, he was brainwashed into playing Grand Theft Auto IV by his nephew exactly 14 hours and 28 minutes before the first murder, we can prove it
judge: oh, i see, then its not his fault, [points to the ESA] i'm sorry but this court believes that video games are the worst thing ever made, therefore if the defendant can prove he played a violent video game before the crime he is totally innocent, if you want you can press charges against Rockstar games

edit: wtf did i just write all that?
July 22nd, 2008 2:56PM(PT)
skatcat31
Don't worry, I too have posted long windy rants on this subject. Even worse are teh studies coming out proving that there is no link. Not only that but the PS3, Windows Vista, and hte Xbox 360 all HAVE parentel controls to lock out gqames of certain ratings, thus hindering the youngins from getting to them. DAMNIT. People are stupid. Persons are smart. Pi R square.
July 22nd, 2008 4:12PM(PT)
THM
As long as they don't ban the R18 rating category, other bills are just fine.

Note: Australia's OFLC banned the R18 rating for videogames. Totally shameful and despicable.
July 23rd, 2008 12:15AM(PT)
DC Sniper
Appalling.
That's all i have to say about this.
Games are becoming more and more attacked, its like they're taking the heat for just about EVERYTHING.

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0213/mc/nova)