Neoseeker : News : New York moves for better parental control in gaming consoles
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Sun, Oct 05
Sat, Oct 04
Fri, Oct 03
Thu, Oct 02
Wed, Oct 01

send article   article comments (6)

New York moves for better parental control in gaming consoles
Lydia Sung - Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 | 3:29PM (PT)


State legislature pushing for more childproof features

New York moves for better parental control in gaming consoles Image 1

The New York State Senate is currently evaluating a new video game bill that is causing some concern in the industry. 

Drafted by Assemblyman Joseph Lentol, Proposition A11717, passed yesterday by the New York State Assembly, would require new consoles to be "equipped" with parental controls, create a governmental advisory board consisting of 16 member, and require game packaging to display ESRB ratings.

As GamePolitics explains, the advisory board/counsil would be given the task of examining the content in a game and make recommendations for the ESRB rating.  It would also work on establishing "a parent-teacher violence awareness program to identify and appropriately assist students who  may  have  a  propensity toward violence."

The State Senate version of this bill is credited to Republican Andrew Lanza; if passed, it will join the Assembly version and be sent upstream to Governor David Paterson, and if signed, will take affect on September 1.

Not surprisingly, the ESA is encouraging New York based members of its Video Game Voters Network to contact their local officials and oppose the new bill.

Now I know that most consoles out there today do have parental control options -- Microsoft's Xbox and Xbox 360, the Nintendo Wii, Sony's PSP, PlayStation 2 and 3.  Call me dense, but I fail to see an obvious problem here.  Is New York trying to make parental controls a default setting?  And last I checked, all my games have a rating on the box, so did people want the rating to cover the entire thing like tiled wallpaper?

Two years ago, BBC News did a story that showed most parents in the UK ignore Mature ratings for video games, thinking their children were mature enough to remain above the game's influence.  It was a noble effort to dissipate the heavy blame that had befallen the gaming industry and rating boards, but where's the fun in that?  After all, it's so much easier to just point fingers rather than do some independent research before throwing away 60 USD on Grand Theft Auto for their twelve year old.

The ESRB does its job, so maybe the parents should do their own.  Here, let me help: Parent Previews.  My work here is done.

Source: none

Section: Announcements

  Related Stories

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

June 24th, 2008 8:19PM(PT)
TLH
Hmmm a new "governmental advisory board"? Does that sound like a new way for politicians to get paid under the table from the fast growing videogame industry? Want our support with your new game project with the ESRB? Pay up....I mean under plz!
June 24th, 2008 10:23PM(PT)
VeGiTAX2
It sounds more like a way for parents to escape their own duties so they can blame the government for not catching that Super High School Slasher IV was violent as hell.

Knowing who is behind the ESRB would probably help you in this matter. The ESA formed it to address government concerns and the ESA of course is made of up gaming industry developers and publishers. You wont find politicians begging for money under the hood there.
June 24th, 2008 10:47PM(PT)
RabidChinaGirl
When I was reading out it, the whole thing came off as sounding pretty flippin' ridiculous. I mean, I can see the premise behind a law that would ask for tighter enforcement of ratings, but this honestly sounded like the worst excuse for lazy parents of America.
June 25th, 2008 2:06AM(PT)
Honor
well thats extream im 11 and im way more mature then my 17 year old cousin even know this is just for the U.S or New york state but its the parents reponsabilty this would be annoying for everyone this is not what should happen to Games out rageous to young people Even know im from Australia
June 25th, 2008 11:48AM(PT)
VeGiTAX2
Indeed it is just another excuse for people who don't want to have any involvement in their child's life.

I mean the back of the box lists the basic things to expect in the game, I think some alarm might go off when the M title ends up reading like this on the back of the pack.

Excessive violence
Drug use
Sexual themes
Sexual encounters
Mature situations
Manslaughter

Although I guess judging by most visits to the store that's not the case since they drop the game into their basket as if it was the latest pokemon title.
June 25th, 2008 11:51AM(PT)
romper
There are better ways out there to make sure you're kids aren't playing mature games.

1. Parents need to inform themselves on what's out there. Try www.whattheyplay.com for starters.

2. Restrict the games that enter the house. Our family rents for www.gamefly.com, who has ESRB-based parental controls built into their site.

We only get our games from GameFly, so there's no question that they at least meet our preferred ESRB ratings. In addition the site has user reviews, screen shots, and if a game isn't suitable we just send it back. When you buy them, you feel obligated to play them.

3. Interact with parents who game. Try http://gamerdadforums.redbirdsolutions.com/phpbb2/index.php, a forum for parents about gaming.

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices
(1.1859/d/ascension)