Official Xbox Magazine replaces cover with advertisement
Future Publishing all about the benjamins
Reason #8,000,000 I don't trust Wikipedia:
"The Official Xbox Magazine is dedicated to review every single Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox Live Arcade, downloadable content, and expansion pack title that ever comes out no matter how small or unpopular the game is."
Contrast that with the latest "cover" of Official Xbox Magazine (pictured above) and you'll see what I'm talking about. It features a full-blown ad for Rainbow Six Vegas 2, serving as a psuedo-cover, hiding the "real" one which features Fallout 3. Also, the back cover features an ad from a second Ubisoft game, Tom Clancy's FutureWar, to be released this fall.
"There's a two-page spread for Rainbow Six Vegas 2 not even twenty pages into the magazine," says Tim Rogers of gaming site insert credit. "Magazines have been figuratively selling their covers to the highest bidder for years now. This is the first time, to my knowledge, that a magazine did so literally."
Ubisoft, by the way, is the same company that decided EGM's coverage of Assassin's Creed was "the last straw" and decided to pull ads and coverage from the magazine. Future Publishing is the same company that publishes Nintendo Power, as well.
Some of you may be wondering why I care about this at all. Well, there are some lines in journalism, and some of them, if only for the sake of preserving integrity and proving honesty (sad people have to do this nowadays, but, y'know), shouldn't be crossed. Journalism has long had a funny little relationship with advertising; a fair portion of us have a sort of 'I'll put up with you because we're roomates and this place is great for the price' kind of relationship with it. Therefore, when advertising actually overtakes the actual content of the magazine (in more ways than one), that's the equivalent of your roomate setting up shop in your room. Your room! It's about not putting a dollar sign on every thing on this planet, as social commentator Bill Hicks would say. You want some ads? Fine. We'll help get the word out. You help us, we help you, hopefully people will make up their own minds about the ads, and we'll all be alright. But this? Why should I trust OXM after this? If they're willing to sell off the covers, why not the content?
Source: insert credit
Sections: Microsoft Consoles, Console Games
Latest Comments
- More Halo 4 multiplayer beta leaks, armor abilities teased [5]
- Mass Effect 3 Rebellion DLC launches today, trailer shows off content [5]
- CryEngine 3 physics demo features "most realistic vehicle damage model ever" [2]
- Diablo III stats reveal most used runes, more [2]
- Next Guild Wars 2 beta weekend event dated, characters will carry over [2]
Most Comments
- Diablo 3 launch marred by bugs, lag, and server disruption [38]
- PlayStation 4 outed via Sony engineer’s LinkedIn profile [34]
- Elder Scrolls Online details, early screenshots leaked [34]
- The Elder Scrolls Online officially confirmed, set a millenium before Skyrim [28]
- Leaked redesigned Wii U controller image shows analog sticks [27]
Latest News
- Tue, May 29
- Far Cry 3 video teases E3 reveal
- RI governor's "devastating" remarks ruined publisher deal, claims 38 Studios founder
- CryEngine 3 physics demo features "most realistic vehicle damage model ever"
- Mass Effect 3 Rebellion DLC launches today, trailer shows off content
- Mass Effect 3 1.03 patch incoming, includes "anti-AFK" system, Vanguard fix, more
- Diablo III stats reveal most used runes, more
- Mon, May 28
- Jet Set Radio coming to Vita
- Prototype 2 Excessive Force DLC launches with trailer
- Next Guild Wars 2 beta weekend event dated, characters will carry over
- More Halo 4 multiplayer beta leaks, armor abilities teased
- Larian teases two-player old-school RPG with Divinity: Original Sin
- Chart-Track: Ghost Recon Future Soldier tops UK charts
- BBC broadcasts Halo UNSC logo during Syria report
- Heavy Rain developer may unveil new game at Sony's E3 presser
- Infinity Ward has received nearly half a billion in bonuses
- Stronghold 3 1.1 patch released, last one says Firefly
- Max Payne 3 PC requirements detailed further, new screens available
- Sun, May 27
- Planetside 2 trailer focuses on air combat
- Risen 2 Air Temple DLC released
- Carmageddon: Reincanation funded on Kickstarter
- Halo 4 multiplayer beta gameplay leak may be the most ridiculous leaked video ever
- Fri, May 25
- Sins of a Solar Empire: Rebellion multiplayer aims to be more accessible, includes Steam integration
- Mass Effect 3 N7 weekend sees more Banshees due to Operation: Silencer failure
- Fresh 'Deadlight' trailer is another reason to watch for this XBLA game
- Hitman: Absolution trailer reveals 'Sniper Challenge' mini-game
Latest Net Reviews
| · | Asus Sabertooth X79 TUF (German) |
| · | Crucial Adrenaline |
| · | Roccat Isku |
| · | Lian Li PC-TU200 |
| · | Corsair Obsidian 550D (German) |
| · | SilenX Effizio EFZ-120HA5 |
Latest Inhouse
I don't see what the problem is. The magazine itself is geared toward a certain demographic, and the games they advertise will be toward that group as well. The group is already inclined to buy it, and would be interested in that product.
It's not like the ad is telling you to buy crack or punch babies.
The problem (and of course, this is just one opinion) is that it's not honest. What if the game is s***? Because this coverage is there simply because it's bought, it tells me nothing other than when the game is coming out, essentially.
Does it deserve all that extra coverage? Should it be allowed to have it simply because it can be bought? That's a lot of space that could be spent on games that actually deserve it, or deserve it more, anyway.
No advertisement tells anyone if the game is bad or good, no matter what type of ad it is. It's an ad. It's supposed to get you to buy it. And I dunno about you, but I don't suddenly get up and go buy a game just because of a snazzy advertisement. At least, not without doing research on my own.
If anyone is so easily influenced by advertising, well, they deserve to be throwing their money away.
Right..which is why anything more than a two-page ad is essentially useless. It's also undeserving of a cover, not only because that essentially demeans all other coverage in the magazine.
Indeed.
When I look at magazine covers, they already look like advertisements, though. Usually, the cover tells you briefly what the magazine features, so it's advertising for both the 'zine and the games.
This full page thing is like a switch off, I think. The magazine isn't advertising for itself anymore, so the ad is essentially targeting those who already buy the 'zine on their own or regularly.
It's like the free newspapers being distributed here in Vancouver these days. All the daily local/international coverage... after flipping past that glaring front page ad for insurance/travel/breath mints!
I can tell you for a fact that these advertising covers aren't on retail stores. At least, not any I've seen.