Neoseeker : News : Early reviews of HD 3870X2 arrive
Neo on: RSS
  • 0 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | Jan 23, 08
    The numbers do vary though, especially in Crysis, makes me wonder if they're really lagging that hard or if it's just the lack of developed driver support.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    lol. If I could play COD4 with it, I would, oh waite, the 360 version is a garaunteed investment, never mind. That way I KNOW it will work, rather than hoping it will work.
  • 0 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | Jan 23, 08
    I'm playing it fine on older hardware, I think after around 1280x1024 I'd stop noticing the benefits since my refresh rate drops off after that (60Hz @ 2048) there's not a whole lot of point once you're doing like 40-60fps.

    The nice benefit of course at higher resolutions is the detail level and how crisp things get, although if you're playing online I think most COD players just think about where the other team is coming out of and if there's someone camping up in the brush around the corner.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    lol. Like I said, I want the Assured investmant, 60FPS and however many Hz refresh rate. But to charectorize how pitiful my system is. My Standing record for FPS on BF2, is 20 FPS, on 800x600 [60Hz]. with medium enrinmental details, like Terrain and such, and Low Dynamic light. Needless to Say, I do not play it anymore. I got tired of the shitty visual experience.
  • 0 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | Jan 23, 08
    Suprising enough, at high it doesn't get a whole lot better. The most annoying thing about BF2 is the fog level, after a lot of the newer titles came about, I stopped having the tolerance I once did for the game in that respect. For a lot of people I think COD4 was the next real move for progression out of BF2.

    Although with 3 apparently in some level of development we can always have hope they'll address it.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    Battlefield BAd company? IS that the one you mean or did I mis something? Also, the fog level in BF2 actualloy makes it what it is, the BF series has always had the fog of war. I like it.
  • 0 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | Jan 23, 08
    Ah it gets annoying with snipers that sit in the outskirt level of the map, other than that it's great, nothing matches the fun of jet / chopper fighting in that game for me.

    Bad company is a more isolated project, BF3 the actual successor is on the way though from DICE. Next-gen performance they say, so hopefully they give it to PC and consoles.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    Yeah really. I want it on the consoles cause my pc is crap. lol.

    The thing with the snipers, Yeah, I can understand that. When I was at the high point of my Game on BF2, I was scoring headshots against choppers, and their pilots. Of course, in single player, that isn't that great an accomplishment.
  • 0 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | Jan 23, 08
    It actually takes a good aim to put down choppers with the M95. The L96A1 became a bit of an obsession online for me, generally because of how stacked the damage and precision is on it. Although no matter what effort was made, the M95 owned the L96 for chopper damage.

    If you check through the benchmarks on that site (not sure if you have) you might get why I kinda wonder about the upgrade situation, the idea is that 2 chips on one board should be really amazing, but instead it's not doing anything really hugely imrpessive.

    The fun part for you though is that when they do bring more upgrades around you could always grab the 3850 AGP and have next gen ownage for a small investment since progression of technology should technically reduce the cards to $120 or lower within a year.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    Lol. Yeah.

    Also, the only reason I ever was able to take down a Chopper with the M95 in single player was cause I modded the gun kits. But yes, any fool [not saying you or anything] should know that the M95 Barret [.50 cal rifle] would own a chopper. One shot and the main roter's drive shaft and BOOM, you found god.
  • 0 thumbs!
    DeathMonkey since Sep 2007 | Jan 23, 08
    I only really played BF2142 and enjoyed it quite alot. Except I installed it recently and suddenly noticed the fog, after playing Crysis it's a bit of a shock
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    Lol. Yeah, Crisis. I am not sure what the "technical" issue regarding the 360 and Crisis. It is evidently gonna make it to the PS3..maybe Sony lined someones pockets..?
  • 0 thumbs!
    DeathMonkey since Sep 2007 | Jan 23, 08
    I'm gonna guess Sony did, they want to prove that the PS3 is more powerful so they do these kind of things. I don't see why the 360 wouldn't be able to run Crysis if my PC can.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 23, 08
    That is exactly my point, also, honestly, the Hardware in the 360 is better than the PS3, Cell procesor not included in that. SO REALLY, why can't it run it? ANd they had BETTER not say because the processor is slow.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Guest Jan 23, 08
    "A card that is /sometimes/ quicker than a 8800 ultra"? Lol sound like someone is wearing green underwear. The truth is that this new card's "pre-launch" benchies show it beating the ultra in 11/13 tests, sometimes by as much as 44%, while using only 30 more watts in a card configuration the same size as the ultra, and oh yea, for $300 less. (let's not forget the ultra launched at $800) Hey kevin maybe "sometimes" you should remember to keep your bias opinion in the forum.
  • 0 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | Jan 24, 08
    Did someone confirm that joe? I thought Crysis on consoles was a rumor still yet to be confirmed by Crytek and EA, I mean it runs in OpenGL already so it eliminates some of the problems around the graphics engine.

    I guess the PS3 will either be running a highly optimized version of the game without normal mapping or they're just going to axe the texture and model quality to get it on there somehow. Even then the RAM consumption on the game is insane at times.

    I had the figures at one point for high around 720p being around 410MB in VRAM and the game itself occupying around 930MB in system memory. It would be interesting to see how Crytek documents their port. The raw memory consumption is why they said consoles were unable to properly run the game.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 since Nov 2005 | Jan 24, 08
    Gamegrep. it had a story on How crisis is supposed to be coming to the PS3...if I remember correctly, it was confirmed.
- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

Hardware Newsletter:
Email:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
Abit
ASUS
Gigabyte
MSI
eVGA
Intel
Tyan
More...

Processors
AMD
Intel
More...

Memory
DDR
DDR2
DDR3
More...

Video Cards
ATI
eVGA
XFX
BFG
Sapphire
More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0500/d/aeon)