Neoseeker : News : Gamespot editor fired for giving unflattering review of Kane & Lynch?
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Fri, Jul 03
Thu, Jul 02
Wed, Jul 01

send article hardware newsletter   article comments (17)

Gamespot editor fired for giving unflattering review of Kane & Lynch?
Kevin Spiess - Friday, November 30th, 2007 | 2:16PM (PT)


Was Jeff Gerstmann fired because Kane & Lynch sucks?

Gamespot editor fired for giving unflattering review of Kane & Lynch? Image 1

Rumors and questions have been raised over the recent firing of Gamespot game reviewer Jeff Gerstmann. Website Primotech, citing unnamed sources, is suggesting that Mr. Gerstmann was fired recently for giving Kane & Lynch 6 out of 10.

Eidos owns the Kane & Lynch property, and a great deal of Eidos advertising for the game can found on Gamespot, adding fuel to these speculations that Mr. Gerstmann's unflattering review of the game made some people unhappy, and that he was canned because of it.

Penny Arcade's comedic take on things can be found here.

Jeff Gerstmann is a very experienced game reviewer, and has been an editor for Gamespot for more than 10 years. But was he fired because of this review? Their are only rumors at this point. But another insider has recently talked in confidence with Primotech, saying that there may be other reasons involved for his termination.

Mr. Gerstmann was supposed to represent Gamespot at the Spike TV video game awards next week, so it is uncertain what will happen there.

Expect further rumors, counter-rumors, conspiracy theories, and anonymous insider-information to surface in relation to this story.

Update: At the very end of Jeff Gerstmann's Gamespot video review of Kane & Lynch, Mr. Gerstmann says the following: "...the multiplayer is probably worth-seeing -- so if you do have the oppourtinity to see it -- without paying full price --  take a look at it." This odd statement can seen as Mr. Gerstmann implying that the pirating of Kane & Lynch is not a bad idea, but buying the game is. Conversely, he could have meant that this game makes a good rental. The comment is ambiguous.

That important last sentence of the video review was brought to my attention by a Youtube comment. The commenter's name was rainerk2. Here is a link to the video.

Update 2: Gamespot made an official comment on the subject. Unfortunately the comment did not shed any light on the matter, as they say they say "it is CNET Networks' policy not to comment on the status of its employees, current of former" (probably out of fear of lawsuits.)

Update 3: Joystiq recently talked to a spokesperson for CNET (which owns Gamespot.) In a weird coincidence, her name is Sarah Cain. While she did not offer much more light on the subject, she did tell Joystiq that CNET does "not terminate employees based on external pressure from advertisers." When questioned on why Gerstmann's video review of Kane & Lynch was pulled off of Gamespot, Sarah Cain said that the review had to be updated to include information about the differences between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of the game, and a clarification about the game's multiplayer mode.

Source: Destructoid

Section: Console Games

  Related Stories

back to news    comments or corrections

Comments:

  • 0 thumbs!
    strike_vanisher | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    What a shame. One of gamespots only good reviewers got fired. GS fails at life.
  • 0 thumbs!
    bruceleethree | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    Jeff was the best and only decent reviewer that company had. I rarely visit them in the first place, mainly due to obnoxious adds everywhere. But now, I hope this company loses all their traffic as IGN is the only game site people should go to now.

    The last site with integrity.

    I hope Jeff finds a job at IGN. He speaks the truth and he's a great reporter. We need more like him.
  • 0 thumbs!
    kspiess | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    Just updated a story with a note about that last sentence he made in the K&L video review.

    Personally I suspect that that comment had a lot to do with his firing, and that Gamespot was not in the wrong in doing so.

    While bias in reviews of games (and hardware ) is a serious issue, I'd personally guess that one comment had more to do with the firing then his 6 out of 10 score.

    That's just my opinion of course. If anymore facts pop up I'll update the story.
  • 0 thumbs!
    kik36 | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    I don't really read that sentence as a comment to go pirate. He could have easily been referring to a sale, or used game purchase. I respect when people say a crappy game isn't worth full MSRP. Some games are worth upwards of $60 while others are just pure garbage and should be a lot less. It isn't uncommon for me to wait for the prices on games to drop down to a more reasonable level and that is what I feel his sentence was referring to.
  • 0 thumbs!
    kspiess | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    Hmm. You might be right. Maybe I jumped to a conclusion there. He could have just meant people should rent the game.
  • 0 thumbs!
    grayfox2 | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    "...the multiplayer is probably worth-seeing -- so if you do have the oppourtinity to see it -- without paying full price -- take a look at it." This odd statement can seen as Mr. Gerstmann implying that the pirating of Kane & Lynch is not a bad idea, but buying the game is.

    He meant a good rental, not a DL. That's reading into things a little much.
  • 0 thumbs!
    kspiess | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    I think I agree with you.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Owen | Nov 30, 07 | quote
    Go figure. CNET, which had it's time in the limelight years ago, yet again proves why they are shell of their former self. Yet another why I don't visit their site anymore.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Ekou | Dec 1, 07 | quote
    I always though he was one of the more terrible reviewers that GS had, granted, none of the reviewers are any good.

    Advertisements and payoffs screw up reviews anyway, it'd suck to work for a place if you couldn't write what you really feel.
  • 0 thumbs!
    bruceleethree | Dec 1, 07 | quote
    Why would he infer pirating? He's not that dumb

    Not paying full price always means a rental.

    It's good to have passion in a review, it shows you really care, like Jeff does.

    The lack of voice from Gamespot on this matter should be more than enough evidence that they're trying to cover their asses and assets at the moment.

    Any non-guilty party would jump to the press right away to clarify things. Gamespot is a scam and always will be.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Chad and Protoman | Dec 1, 07 | quote
    Actually his ratings arn't far off from IGN's here are the ratings form IGN

    Reader reviews(20 ratings 2 reader reviews)
    6.0

    press average(out of 3 press ratings)
    6.7

    IGN's rating(this is the websites rating)
    7.0

    As you can see the ratings from IGN and the ratings that Jeff gave arn't that far off, and on IGN a 7.0 is considered DECENT. So whats the only diffenence between the 2 websites? 1 avratized the game more than the other one so if the website that had all the ads gives the game a bad rating they'll lose the money and that company will never put ads there AGAIN.
  • 0 thumbs!
    bruceleethree | Dec 1, 07 | quote
    IGN had HUGE ADS for Kane and Lynch btw.

    This is all Gamespot's doing do to money pressures.

  • 0 thumbs!
    Cillchaoi | Dec 1, 07 | quote
    Agreed. That is why any truly independent and dependable evaluation source does not accept advertising dollars or even "typical samples" from manufacturers.

    The way that Consumers Union (the producers of Consumers Report) magazine operates, for example, is by the money made of the subscriptions and by buying a typical unit of whatever it is directly off the shelf of some random retailer. This way, they insure that they do not get a "prettied up" version of the unit. Also, they make sure that the companies cannot put inappropriate pressure on them to give the reviews that are desired.

    Because of this, I never trust reviews from outfits such as CNet/Gamespot. I look for someone who is independent or do my own evaluations based on what is available from my suppliers.
  • 0 thumbs!
    iamjoe56 | Dec 1, 07 | quote
    End user reviews are good. Most of the time, the people will think differantly than the big companies.
  • 0 thumbs!
    kspiess | Dec 3, 07 | quote
    Gamebump also pointed out today that the Kane & Lynch website had very suspect and misleading quotes from game review sites in their flash animation for the game.

    Specifically they said that Game Informer gave them five stars, when in fact, they only gave the game a 7 out of 10.

    http://www.gamebump.com/go/official_kane_and_lynch_website_lies_about_its_scores
  • 0 thumbs!
    kspiess | Dec 3, 07 | quote
    And in further JG news, I Recommend this 'insider information' from a gamespot employee if you are interested in reading (even) more about this story: http://valleywag.com/tech/jeff-gerstmann/gamespot-editor-on-fired-writer-328775.php
  • 0 thumbs!
    u4ea | Dec 28, 07 | quote
    frankly, I would say the biggest proof that he wasnt intending for people to pirate it would be that, like most games, you need a VALID CD KEY to play MULTIPLAYER. usually something unnattainable when pirating. DUH
- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
Abit
ASUS
Gigabyte
MSI
eVGA
Intel
Tyan
More...

Processors
AMD
Intel
More...

Memory
DDR
DDR2
DDR3
More...

Video Cards
ATI
eVGA
XFX
BFG
Sapphire
More...

search for lowest prices
(0.1155/d/nova)