Neoseeker : News : The Apple/AT&T Genuine Dis-Advantage.
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Sun, Jul 20
Sat, Jul 19
Fri, Jul 18
Thu, Jul 17
Wed, Jul 16
Tue, Jul 15

send article hardware newsletter   article comments (4)

The Apple/AT&T Genuine Dis-Advantage.
J. Micah Grunert - Monday, September 24th, 2007 | 4:22PM (PST)


Microsoft does it with less than genuine copies of Windows, and now Apple is going to do the same with hacked iPhones.

It's quite alright for a company or service provider to protect their product, but to try and maintain a strangle hold over their own monopoly is a little excessive.

A statement from give by Apple this afternoon hints that their next iPhone software update could render all hacked iPhones useless. To put it bluntly; your $400 buck iPhone becomes a paper weight if it was hacked to run on any network other than AT&T.

As most will have heard, early adopter of the iPhone became quite interested in unlocking the iPhone so they could use their own service provider and no be locked into the AT&T network woes. Many people of course suspected that Apple would issue some software update to prevent this unlocking, but disabling the phone completely seems a little excessive.

"Apple has discovered that many of the unauthorized iPhone unlocking programs available on the Internet cause irreparable damage to the iPhone's software, which will likely result in the modified iPhone becoming permanently inoperable when a future Apple-supplied iPhone software update is installed," Apple had said in a statement. "Apple strongly discourages users from installing unauthorized unlocking programs on their iPhones. Users who make unauthorized modifications to the software on their iPhone violate their iPhone software license agreement and void their warranty. The permanent inability to use an iPhone due to installing unlocking software is not covered under the iPhone's warranty."

There is of course ways to restore the iPhone to its 'Factory Default Settings' should Apple's supposed update cause any damage, then allowing the iPhone to be flashed to the latest software version. This latest version of the the iPhone OS allows users to access the iPhone Wi-Fi Music Store which was launched earlier this month. Look for (or avoid) this update which is scheduled for sometime later this week.

But of course, it is quite certain that hackers will find some way around this implied software nightmare. And Apple will likely respond by disabling hacked iPhones with every subsequent software update for the next couple of years, or at least until their partnership will AT&T is over.

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

September 24th, 2007 7:25PM(PST)
Stevebeoulve2
Eh. I kind of saw this coming. I'd be pissed of I knew that someone's hacking my product to use with another company besides mine.
September 24th, 2007 8:14PM(PST)
MicahWrites
This may not be a fair analogy but . . .

If Ford says their cars wun best on Shell gasoline would it be fair of them to put something in their cars to kill the engine if it detected something other than Shell gasoline?

In my view this is a violation of fair use if Apple intentionally cripples hacked iPhones that don't run on the AT&T network.

But of course, they have a bazillion lawyers to hammer out ultra-fine print EULA's that give them more power than any deity or omnipitent being out here.
September 24th, 2007 10:59PM(PST)
Cillchaoi
Actually, a better analogy would be AOL's client software. They write their software to be used for their service. If someone modifies the program to dial into another provider (such as Earthlink or PeoplePC), it does not mean that AOL must support the modified version nor does it mean that they should rewrite future versions of the software so that they can continue to be modified or to allow easier modification for accessing other providers. They are writing their code to support the uses for which the technology was intended. Apple is doing the same thing.

I shall also point out that when one buys a PCS phone, they realize that the only provider with whom they can use it is Sprint. It doesn't mean that someone might try to modify the phone to work on CDMA or TDMA instead of PCS but it does mean that the phone is no longer supported by the manufacturer in that configuration nor will it be expected to continue to work in an alternate configuration if the software is updated to a new version provided by the manufacturer.
September 25th, 2007 12:14PM(PST)
MicahWrites
If people just wait several months Apple will start opening up the contracting possibilities to other service providers. Everbody's stuck with AT&T right now because the offered the best bid to Apple for the first exclusive rights.

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments
Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices

(0.0816/d/nova)