Steve Balmer says that piracy is the reason for slow Vista sales. Could there be any other reason.
With the dawn of a new Microsoft OS upon us, it seems that not everybody is so eager to jump on the Vista bandwagon. It kinda re-minds me of Windows Millennium, a skinned and crash crazy version of Windows 98. But ask Microsoft CEO Steve Balmer and he'll say that pirates are responsible for the slow sales of Windows Vista.
Balmer had admitted to some financial analysts that the current Vista sales figures are nowhere near what Microsoft had projected. And Balmers reason for the poor sales is laid upon the poor software pirates in China, India, Brazil, Russia and other emerging market countries.
And the brilliant solution to help fix this problem? Crank up the Windows Genuine (Dis)Advantage feature to thwart piracy. Apparently, there are further measures that Microsoft can take that would make it hacking and cracking life even more difficult for those would be Vista pirates there. I smell a mandatory Vista update coming along . . . one that will either accuse you of being a pirate or will crash you machine.
Sure, there's some Vista pirates out there, and that does detract from the revenues that Microsoft would like to have. But Mr. Balmer neglected to point out that Vista really doesn't really offer much more in the way of features that XP does. And he never mentioned how the Windows Genuine (Dis)Advantage makes the everyday lives of ever day users an absolute living hell. So if Microsoft does decide to crank up WGA in some futile attempt to cull piracy, it might just backfire on them.
Hey, I'm slowly making the switch to Linux, with some interest in buying up a Mac, and will continue to use XP for gaming and gaming alone.
LOL
No such thing.
Any multi-tasking OS is by definition "multi core optimized".
Now if you'd said that it supported NUMA, interrupt binding, etc., you might have a point - and it does support NUMA, but last I heard it did not take much advantage of knowing which processor which memory address range belonged to on AMD systems.
Its not like the step up from 98 to XP, but rather, a glorified XP OS...
Still though, its good enough thus far...
I am a professional programmer. I still use Windows2000, and am very tempted to recreate this "vista aero" shell over top of this OS before I would *EVER* buy Vista.
I didn't like WindowsXP, and Vista is simply ridiculous. The system requirements are extreme, and simply not the direction I'm going as a computer user or developer. Software is supposed to get fast, and more optimized with every revision.. NOT follow the path poor development path of Windows.
http://www.explore-rpg.com
(pffft, pirates. As if)
(pffft, pirates. As if)
I've played with Vista and from what I can tell, it's pretty much XP after 7 years of plastic surgery at the hands of Fisher Price. Yes, it honestly looks like a toy, treats the user like an idiot, and offers (supposedly) brand new features that both Apple and Linux have been doing for years. And I would swear on a stack of AOL CDs that Vista is just a skinned version of XP. If you really like the looks, just Google for 'vista skins' and pick one.
Vista will be the next Millennium OS from Microsoft; big hype, no delivery.
But exploreRPG, if you do manage to duplicate the aero shell for XP, could I beg, borrow, burn, or buy a copy? Or I could just keep using the 3-D desktop in Linux...
So does this mean m$ aint happy with vista either? btw this statement was quickly poo pooed by them after they realised what he had said, naturally enough when they wanna sell copies but rumours suggest there was quite a loud DOH from the guy involved!