Long list of complaints in his blog, though he still finds it funny

Last week we posted a segment from The Daily Show which covered free to play games -- specifically, Tap Fish. The piece certainly made the company's CEO Rizwan Virk look like the bad guy, when, according to his blog, this is not at all the case.
It's a "fake news show", sure, but it has its serious moments, and satirical or not, it's hard to argue against the old "truth to every joke" adage. As such, it still has the potential to affect reputation.
Virk, defending that reputation, says the segment was edited and produced with the intention of making him look like the bad guy, which to an extent he feels would be acceptable for the purposes of humor, but in most cases was unnecessary and unfair.
At one point in the bit, Virk is yelled at by a parent angry about his kids' overspending on the game. According to him, the overall tone was actually quite reasonable and pleasant, partly because the parent had actually gotten a refund, and was the one that gave his password out to begin with -- information not depicted by The Daily Show.
There's a long list of details on what went down, so if you're keen, hit the source and read up.
Summarizing, Virk recognizes the humor in the piece, but makes it clear some of it is just not okay.
"Despite being almost entirely inaccurate, editing out the most relevant information about my conversation with the parent (and making me look squirmy when they sprung it on me), believe it or not, there were still a few things about the segment that I found funny, so I guess I have to just laugh at it."
"But I didn’t find the implication that we’re consciously out to exploit kids funny at all (nor should Jon Stewart or Aasif Mandvi or the Daily Show Producers), and they could’ve shown this wasn't the case, if they'd wanted to, by simply showing my actual conversation with the parent on the phone! But the parent and I were "too reasonable" and weren’t swearing at each other enough!! To say that is our primary business purpose is insulting to the millions of players who have played for free, it’s insulting to (the very few) entrepreneurs who are building the new economy and creating jobs here in the US."
"The real lesson for me from being on the Daily Show? Welcome to show business – where nothing is quite what it seems, and heroes and villans are made in the script and the editing room, and have very little to do with real life."
Commenters offer some good advice: "don't let TV people hang around your office for 4 hours", and have a media rep present to moderate all activity.
Source: Zen Entrepreneur
Sections: Handheld Games, Mobile Games
| · | Asus Sabertooth X79 TUF (German) |
| · | Crucial Adrenaline |
| · | Roccat Isku |
| · | Lian Li PC-TU200 |
| · | Corsair Obsidian 550D (German) |
| · | SilenX Effizio EFZ-120HA5 |
For example DC...I could take your comment and use every trick in the book to make you look like a fool, you wouldn't like it but you entered the dragon's den when you posted that comment on this article.
What the Daily show did was dishonest and down right a low blow. Sure the CEO of Tapfish kind of left himself open to it but the final version of the episode painted a completely different picture to what the CEO expected (The guy even stated it was still funny but the key factors were left out)
Again, there's a difference between what the Daily Show did and satirical news.
They haven't just mocked Tapfish, they could have potentially cost the company thousands, if not millions within profit, revenue and most importantly the fan base.
Justify their actions however you see fit but at the end of the day, not everyone knows that the daily show is satirical news. They would see that as serious news and that's what these people need to understand. The media is a powerful tool and people will eat up whatever is put in front of them.
So if someone is stating that it is easy to purchase a $99 item with one click, they are not going to download that app...that is a potential customer lost to Tapfish. Furthermore the CEO was very happy to wave most of the interview under the rug, the bit that you seem to be skipping past is the interview with the irate parent.
Which stems back to the "It's the parent's fault for giving his children the password to his itunes account in the first place" Not Tapfish's fault, not the Daily Show's fault but the parent's and yet not once was that ever made a point...instead they took advantage of it and abused it.
That my friend is not satirical news, that is sabotage of a company's reputation and the best way shows like the daily show can ever get ratings.
Where on earth did you get that assumption? Your comment is screaming "ASSumption", you know.
Mocking Tapfish? When does any common peon actually believe stuff seen on Comedy Central, much less the Daily Show? That's like believing that all the how-to's on /b/ are trustworthy. Making "crystals"? Mustard gas, fatal. Getting "energy" by injecting O2? Also fatal.
You seem quite inept at the concept of Comedy Central, they don't even air anything seriously newsworthy, nor should anyone be assuming that news are hosted on there. Fox is a better source.
The best way it can ever get ratings? You're pretty simple-minded if you think that they do interviews like that every day. I sure haven't seen Aasif do that every day for companies.
Just because it is on comedy central or "satirical" doesn't give the daily show any justification for what they have done.
Again there's a difference between mocking someone and ruining their reputation.
So ok here's an example for you:
You have a lemonade stand, a journalist says "Hey, I want to write an article about you, now there will be a few comical bits in there but don't worry about it"
You accept because you know, you have a sense of humour only to find days later the article claims you pee in the product you sell...hey that's funny right? Because you know, Lemonade looks like..pee but would you and your customers find that funny?
No you would be standing there seeing people giving you odd looks, not buying your product.
That's what has happened here
"if you think that they do interviews like that every day. I sure haven't seen Aasif do that every day for companies."
Mmmmmm I love the smell of fanboyism in the morning....so what's different here? Are you now implicating that the daily show set out to intentionally hurt Tapfish? That they dislike the free to play market so much that they would hurt the reputation of a company that works within that market?
You are the one that seems pretty simple minded here DC....overall I'm all for taking jabs, I'm all for having a laugh but this episode they did shows nothing of the sort and like you said "You haven't seen Aasif do this every day for other companies....so why start now and why on Tapfish?"
Answer me one question DC....Why are the daily show fabricating lies? and we're not talking about little white lies either...if you haven't picked up on it yet DC...CEO of Tapfish explained that it costs under $1 to revive ALL fish within their game and you have to go through security checks such as putting in your password in order to confirm your purchase. NOT $99 at one click like the daily show want you to believe....so why did they do this? They could have made a generic company name up, they did not have to implicate or point fingers