Trouble hitting targets at a distance
Recent tests of an experimental anti-missile Boeing 747, referred to as the ABL (airborne laser), were a success for the United States military. But they were successful in the sense that they seemed to have successfully shown that a new tack was needed, to fully realize the goal of building anti-missile planes.
The ABL has three lasers on it: one of tracking, one for beam modulation, and for exploding stuff up. Though the ABL successfully shot down multiple in-flight missiles, the US seems to have determined that the lasers used will not be of sufficient ability to shoot down targets at a range of up to 200 km, which was one of the program's primary goals.
The software and laser tracking system seems to have worked fine on the ABL -- the next step, it seems, for this platform, is the development of more powerful lasers, that do not suffer as much beam diffusion. One promising avenue seems to be using "diode-pumped" alkali lasers, which are fortified by the electrons of vaporized clouds of potassium or cesium.
One thing is for certain: lasers are a very viable weapon of war, and will be used in the future for anti-missile platforms, whether they be plane, or ground based. From the very invention of the laser the potential was seen by the military, and now, about 60 years later, we are developing the technology and engineering expertise to make bring this fancy new weapon out of the pages of science fiction and into reality. An anti-missile laser system, able to fire from long distances, would be vastly superior to existing anti-missile technology, such as Patriot missiles, which, according to some people, have an intercept rate of less than 10%.
Of course, no system is 100% effective. A laser-based anti-missile system could feasibly be defeated by being overwhelmed by simulatenous missile strikes, or, be countered with a refractive coating applied to missiles. An additional downside of laser-based anti-missile planes would be that an enemy would have an easy time at locating the plane, if it was firing.
Source: New Scientist
Section: Technology
| · | Asus Sabertooth X79 TUF (German) |
| · | Crucial Adrenaline |
| · | Roccat Isku |
| · | Lian Li PC-TU200 |
| · | Corsair Obsidian 550D (German) |
| · | SilenX Effizio EFZ-120HA5 |
Besides, this is a hardware site.
Also Neoseeker is more of a technology website that leans towards video gaming. Note that there are plenty of forums that relate to technology that may or may not be related to video games, such as web programming and audiophiles.
Hellfire -=> It certainly would work better as a ground-based system, because powering the lasers in a plane is a trick. But, planes do have the mobility advantage of being able to be used over hostile territory, and also, I assume, would have an easier time firing vast distances because of the height advantage and perhaps atmospheric conditions as well. Furthermore , the US generally enjoys air superiority with their super-advanced massively expensive high-tech planes, so they would not have to worry about getting knocked out of the sky so much, unless some very improbable war against Europe or Russia broke out. More likely a plane of this type would be beefing up the defenses of Israel, South Korea, or Taiwan.
This program dates from DOD meetings in the late 1960's, early 70's.
My father was issued a patent on the electron guns that drive the ganged chemical lasers in 1979!
www.google.com/patents/about?id=h-ksAAAAEBAJ&dq=Sepulveda+Northrup+barnett
I worked from October 1975 through early 1978 to sell the program to the American people. www.imdb.com/name/nm0055886/
I have friends who joined and spent careers in the US Airforce just to participate in this wet dream.
Lucas murderd more people than Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Curis LeMay combined. Curtis took out one million persons on a Saturday morning 10 March 1945.
The imolation of the people of Asia was the goal of the B29 bomber program, executed in less than 4 years. Gelled gasoline was tested in Iowa with fake wood towns, support logistics developed in India under
Lord MontBatont, eventualy destroying almost every building on the Korean peninsula and more than 50% of one hundred and eight citys, 3/5ths of all the homes in Japan.
Soldiers should eat their dead opponents out of respect, not murder them with robots while sitting in North Las Vegas.
www.rsof.org
They bought a 56ft diameter (over six stories tall) vacume sphere, cut it into gores, railed it down from Seattle and welded it back together to exhaust spent gasses into, during initial tests in the 1980's. The deadly chemicals are driven at Mach numbers across the lase cavity. I bet the crew of that 747 (and punk C130) live on bottled air.
Like the famous Titan balistic missile, the fuel kills with a single breath.
At least with solid propellent strapon boosters, like the Delta IV, the Shuttle, European Ariane etc. your exhaust just puts millions of pounds of Ozone eating chlorines into the stratosphere, killing unnamed foreigners and American farmers who are to stupid to stay indoors.
P.S. I joined the US Army in 1969. E4, MOS 91B20 & 91U20 and spent years pushing legitamate space exploration. I had to fix R2D2 and C3P0 out of my home garage in 1977-8, and now design NH3 liquid fueled aircraft.