Neoseeker : News : StarCraft II LAN petition hits 100,000 signatures
Neo on: RSS

StarCraft II LAN petition hits 100,000 signatures

Sean Ridgeley - Monday, August 17, 2009 9:47am (PST) 0 Favourite (1)

Fans plead with Blizzard

Source: Petition Online

Section: PC Games

  • 0 thumbs!
    gerard way owns you Aug 17, 09
    I've never played SC, but I've always wanted to. Regardless, they are stupid if they ignore the FANS, you know, the people who GOT THEM TO WHERE THEY ARE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
  • 2 thumbs!
    kspiess Aug 17, 09
    100,000 is an impressive milestone.
  • Staff
    2 thumbs!
    tekmosis Aug 17, 09
    SC2 I'm a bit disappointed in that they're losing LAN but what's going to make me even more sad is that this is probably going to transition over to Diablo 3 as well. Having no LAN in D3 is going to make me really sad.
  • 1 thumbs!
    streetcarp81 Aug 17, 09
    i remember having huge lan parties when SC1 came out. my friends would come over with our computers, set them up in the basement and have matches all night and sneaking beers inbetween matches all while my parents were upstairs. great times. now i will not be hosting huge lan parties now with SC2, i still want that option and it should be in there or i will not buy it.
  • 1 thumbs!
    huntyr Aug 17, 09
    I'm willing to be most of those 100,000 will buy it anyhow.
  • Staff
    0 thumbs!
    chautemoc Aug 17, 09
    Hopefully Activision Blizzard isn't too..
  • 0 thumbs!
    Zertz Aug 17, 09
    People will still buy SC2 even if they decide not to implement LAN and even if some of those 100 000 people really don't buy it, it's a negligible amount for Blizzard
  • 0 thumbs!
    jdj1976 Aug 17, 09
    as a person who used to have hardcore lan party weekends
    i want to say its a bad decision on their part lan has always been an integral part of games like starcrat,warcraft,diablo

    i relay miss the old days we would start on a friday and rotate quake2,unreal2.dibalo 2,rainbowsix rogue spear and try to stay awake til sunday hehe those were the days

    but sadly i have been waiting for starcraft 2 for so long im gona be one of the ones who buys it lan or no lan
  • 0 thumbs!
    Danny Boy Aug 18, 09
    This is supposedly just an "anti-piracy" measure. Actiblizzard should wake up: if someone won't buy the game because he can pirate it and play on LAN, he's not going to buy it without that feature. Piracy is inevitable, but this hurts paying customers and the feature set of the game, and while this game will be a great hit (like all Blizzard games in the past 15 years), but the question is won't the small percentage that won't buy it due to that fact offset the pirates who'll say "hey, there's no LAN, I'll buy it now", and won't the long-term damage to the Blizzard-can-do-no-wrong aura cost far, far more?
  • 0 thumbs!
    James Aug 22, 09
    I agree with Blizz... I want them to take all DRM off the game, but its fine if they want to make it b.net only for multiplayer. Honestly I will play it regardless but if I could play it without needing to pay for it I would...
  • Staff
    0 thumbs!
    chautemoc Aug 22, 09
    Requiring Battle.net for multiplayer is DRM.
- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

Hardware Newsletter:
Email:
Latest News
Latest Inhouse
VisionTek Racer 120GB SSD Review PowerColor HD 7850 PCS+ Review G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400 Memory Review Sapphire HD 7770 GHz Edition Vapor-X Review AMD 2nd Gen APU Corsair Accelerator 30GB & 60GB Review
(0.2712/d/web8)