Neoseeker : News : Twitter gradually losing steam

Twitter gradually losing steam
Lydia Sung - Friday, May 1st, 2009 | 10:34AM (PT) 0 Like Favourites (0)


Market research shows little room for improvement

Twitter gradually losing steam Image 1

Fads come and go when the proverbial flock loses interesting, and all the sheep drift to another, greener pasture.  This appears to be the case with micro-blogging service Twitter.

With the initial celebrity exposure, it's no wonder Twitter became such a sensation, but the majority of users don't actually stick around.  Just a few weeks ago, Twitter reportedly had a 131 percent increase in U.S. visitors alone, between February and March 2009.  Earlier this month, traffic was up by 700 percent, year-over-year; this boom has been attributed to an influx of middle-aged users in addition to media attention.

However, a report from media tracker Nielsen Co. revealed that 60 percent of Twitter users actually don't revisit the month after they join, and even at the height of its popularity, the site hada meager retention rate below 30 percent.  By contrast, Facebook and MySpace both have a retention rate above 70 percent following their popularity growth.

"Twitter just doesn't seem to have a whole lot of stickiness to it," said Ezra Gottheil, an analyst at Technology Business Research Inc.  "People join Twitter ... and then it has to be an on-going commitment. Twitter's charm is that it's immediate and instant. The minute you get busy, it's usefulness fades." 

He goes on to add, "It's a major head scratcher because it's intrinsically a slice of time.  I hope they reach a phase of general stability. It has to level off at some point and it won't level off at everyone in the whole world using Twitter."

Source: The Standard

Section: Technology

  • 3 thumbs!
    kspiess since Jun 2007 | May 1, 09
    Awesome news..!
  • 0 thumbs!
    | May 1, 09
    I don't necessarily agree. Twitter is building a stronger core of followers who are committed to it. It's naturally weeding out those who has no interest on the site. Don't think the retention rate is bad, but it should be determined in order to avoid any more clog ups in the system.
  • -1 thumbs!
    | May 1, 09
    This report has received a lot of attention over the last few days. It's my understanding that this counts only Twitter use via the website. By this measure I am one of these unretained users (along with just about everyone I know). The stats are flawed and don't reflect reality.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Urban since Sep 2008 | May 2, 09
    It had to happen to Twitter eventually.
    Thay can't be awesome all the time.
  • -2 thumbs!
    | May 2, 09
    The misunderstanding and oversight here is that Twitter is NOT a website. It is not Facebook and neither is it mySpace. It asks you to interact... nothing else has done that before. It is not about retention it is about depth... Think of Twitter in terms of TV and Facebook in terms of a magazine.
    I agree with Kevin... an overhyped article, badly put together
  • 2 thumbs!
    VeGiTAX2 since Apr 2001 | May 2, 09
    Twitter is a social update site, it's basically a 140 character personal news wire for the world.

    I wouldn't compare twitter to TV, you don't interact with your TV it merely sits there and exposes you to mass programming. It's more or less poker night with friends or a large amount of eerie people that you didn't know were stalking you. You talk about some facets of your day / life in a mass circle and at the end of the night everyone goes back to their own world.

    I don't get the high praise though, but at the same time I don't feel like posting a timeline of events from a bad trip to the bathroom for the world to see thinking I'll get some unknown people to join in and relate.

    Don't think that it's that people don't "get" twitter, it's more or less that we don't entirely care for your cup of tea.
  • 0 thumbs!
    | May 4, 09
    This report is corrupted and flawed. Most people who join Twitter also download a desktop, iPod touch, or phone client, or only update through text messages.

    Visits to the webpage will obviously drop as a user is more involved in Twitter.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Redemption since Mar 2000 | May 4, 09
    quote simon jae
    It is not Facebook and neither is it mySpace. It asks you to interact... nothing else has done that before. It is not about retention it is about depth... Think of Twitter in terms of TV and Facebook in terms of a magazine.
    Twitter may or may not be losing steam, but to state that no other service before Twitter asks you to interact is gross exaggeration. People have been interacting via their computers since modems were invented. I think Twitter is more of an evolution or extension of the interaction many shared for YEARS, and even then its not everyone's cup of tea - I have no interest in Twittering, and neither do ANY of my friends, yet most of them are on Facebook and spend much time there.

    Anyway, anyone who says that the fact the Twitter website has low stickiness is irrelevant should consider this: I don't know what Twitter's long term business model is, but I would think it relies at least partly on some of their supporters using the site instead of relying 100% on non-website related methods of consuming the service.
    Last edited by Redemption :: May 4, 09
- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

Hardware Newsletter:
Email:



Compare Prices

Motherboards
Abit
ASUS
Gigabyte
MSI
eVGA
Intel
Tyan
More...

Processors
AMD
Intel
More...

Memory
DDR
DDR2
DDR3
More...

Video Cards
ATI
eVGA
XFX
BFG
Sapphire
More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0528/mc/nova)