Thread titleFromLast replied
Now searching...
Neoseeker Forums » » Hardware, Builds and Overclocking » Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC2-8000 Review posted » Post Reply

Note to Guests: Advertising of any kind is not allowed in these forums!If you fix your problem on your own, please post a message describing how you fixed the issue so that others with a similar problem can use your method to fix their issue.
REPLY TO A THREAD
Name:* Members, please LOGIN before posting
Email: We use this to display your Gravatar

Sign in with
Subject:*
Message:*


HTML is not allowed
markup is allowed

Help with markup tags

Enabling Buttons in IE7




Smilies:
  ·all smilies here
:) :P ;) :( :| ;( :D :confused: :cool: :# :o ^_^ :colored: :thick:

hideOriginal Post

Jan 18, 07 at 10:52pmbhenning


Hi guys,

Some premium memory goodness for ya!

Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC2-8000 DDR2 Review & 975X Memory Performance Roundup

Thread Recap (last 10 posts from newest to oldest)

Jan 19, 08 at 12:29am
URLORD


I love my Tracer, I've overclocked to 1270mhz 5-5-5-18 but I prefer the tighter timings as you can see in my sig.



Jan 18, 08 at 11:47pm
SoulStalker


I recently bought another set of 2x1gb crucial ballistix and installed it, i already had a set of 2x1gb crucial ballistix installed even before this. When i went to install i started up the computer, they were glowing normally with the blinking LED's, and then it just decided to freeze at the bios message. It does this everytime, i went to uninstall it and everything worked fine again, when i started the comp when the new set was installed, the harddrive light would never blink. Idk if it's disabling the harddrive somehow or what, but i'm really sure they're not DOA because they're still blinking and glowing on the motherboard. Can anyone help? my specs are 2.4ghz intel dual core, 8800gts nvidia, 700wPSU, 2gbx1 crucial ballistix (hope to get the other set installed if i can fix this) windows xp (it says it can use up to 4gb of mem even 32 bit edition) and 150gb raptor WD, plz help, i really hope to run 4gb of this and see what they can do



Aug 25, 07 at 6:40am
dark41


After testing, I still think the Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 is a better bargain than the Ballistix PC2-8500.

I've got 1210MHz max with the 6400, and 1235MHz max with the 8500. Also, CPU-Z 1.40.5 shows the 8500 as 6400. Makes me wonder if they aren't the exact same chip with different labels.



Aug 24, 07 at 11:31am
Scott_ill


I take it the corsair ram used was the standard PC8500 and not the dominator sticks?

I was very close to buying Crucial as part of my upgrade. Impressive results and guarenteed to undercut the competition pricewise.

Also, in writemark bench shouldn't the average M/B per sec be taking as the bench statistic rather than the max reached as that gives a clearer indication of performance over time?

This message was edited by Scott_ill on Aug 24 2007.



Aug 22, 07 at 12:54pm
dark41


Actually I'll have some Ballistix PC2-8500 in house tomorrow to test (got it for the same price as the PC2-6400), so I'll know for sure. But the best I've seen posted to date is 1280MHz with the 8500, and 1210MHz on the 6400. Either way, Ballistix rocks.



Aug 19, 07 at 5:41am
dark41


Oh well. I guess it's not worth upgrading to me for few measley MHz more. The Crucial Ballistix PC6400 overclocks to 1200MHz stable and seems to run within a second of the PC2-8000 at 1MB on SuperPi.

http://www.ultramaxcc.com.au/images/bestsuperpi.jpg



Jul 16, 07 at 9:04pm
dark41


Anyone?

I realize this thread is 7 months old. The reason I ask is that my Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 is performing basically the same as the reviewed Crucial PC2-8000. It really wouldn't be worth the extra money to buy 8000 for me unless it ran better on the 965P or was revised by Crucial since the review.



Jul 16, 07 at 6:10am
dark41


I like the review as I'm considering the Crucial Ballistix Tracer 8000. Thanks for the work you put into the article.

One thing that stood out to me though is your results with the Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400. I have 2 (2x1g) sets of this RAM on 965P chipsets and my results are quite different to yours. Both run at 4-3-3-8 timings up to 900MHz. At that point I have to relax timings to 4-4-4-12 and can get up to 960MHz. By relaxing the timings to 5-5-5-15 I can achieve 1200MHz. (SPD states 4-4-4-12 @ 400MHz and 5-5-5-15 @ 500MHz) All of this is at 2.1v and both sets of RAM perform identically. My opinion is that the PC2-6400 is some of the best performance RAM on the market because of these results.

So do you think Crucial made modifications to the PC2-6400 at some point after you reviewed it, or are the results on the 965P just that much superior to the 975X?

This message was edited by dark41 on Aug 14 2007.



Jan 19, 07 at 8:43pm
Anonymous


Yeah, these reviews are usually a great learning tool.

bhenning, check your NeoPM inbox.



Jan 19, 07 at 8:29pm
Iceguy2003


Ah, I'm looking forward to more. Then I'll know what kind of DDR2 to be looking at for my next system. Yeah, there was a ton of great data in that review, and that kind of work is time consuming, good job and nice work.



Powered by neoforums v2.3.0 (Bolieve)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2014

Neoseeker.com   |   Forum Rules   |   Forum FAQ   |   Neoseeker Terms of Use   |   Supermods On Duty [ server id: web2 ··· elapsed: 0.2300]
Chat and Lounges
Game Platforms
Mobile Platforms