quote hiigaranWe all use the same testbed, but it changes over time. When the HAF cases were tested different hardware was used in the testbed, so a comparison wasn't possible without retesting the HAF case, which I no longer had.to my understanding, each reviewer tried to always use the same testbed, but between reviewers, there may be significant differences. im sure someone can confirm that.
quotethe problem is, you cant make comparisons like that, unless every single review is controlled properly. if one reviewer tests a case with a certain set of hardware, every other reviewer must use the exact same set of hardware, and have the exact same ambient temperature, in order to provide an accurate comparisonFor the comparison, my idea of overhauling how comparison are made by having the results kinda placed in the product database should make comparions for products easier. I'm not talking about the forum mergers.
quote hiigaranTBH when they do the under-the-hood reviews for things like the graphics card, where they completely dismantle the casing, which for normal people would void warranties, I'd imaging the company wouldn't want the card back, unless it's one of their 'reference' cards or something for the series that just so happen to get sent out everywhere for display purposes or something.how do reviews work for you guys anyway? do you get the hardware, test it, and then send it back, or...?
quote hiigaranThere's not really a "point" to inverting the motherboard tray, it's just something different.im not sure i understand the point to inverting the mobo tray, but damn, there are some neat features in there. that card support is neat idea.
still feels incomplete without a comparison to the HAFs.
Powered by neoforums v2.3.9b (Bolieve)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2016