quote GaTheZakkYou're not listening to what other people are saying.It looks like bbb7002004 understands, 3ds will definately still have it's Multiplayer and if anything it will probrobly be one of two modes, Adventure and Multiplayer or it could be Classic and Multiplayer, ether way they are going to have the core Multiplayer that Super Smash Bros was always known and loved for.
Not to mention they have to kick Playstation All stars' butt with these two game.
quote bbb7002004An Adventure Smash Bros., yes. I spent maybe 20 hours on Subspace Emissary, and 500 hours on vs. mode. Vs. mode has always been the focus of Smash Bros. for a reason. The mechanics were built around the idea of a fighting game. Even though they worked well as a side-scrolling platformer, they didn't work as well.I don't really understand your point. A multiplayer adventure game is somehow less worth an extra purchase than a straight up vs. mode?
quote bbb7002004But Adventure mode loses a lot of fun alone, and buying 2 JUST for adventure was my problem. If multiplayer was included, I'm fine with it.I was thinking more in terms of the Wii U version, but even with the 3DS version you'd need multiple copies for multiplayer anyway. Its not like it would be a requirement anyway, just the option to have partners in your adventure mode.
quote GaTheZakkRegalBryant didn't say anything about Adventure Mode "sucking."See Regal Bryant knows how much this game would suck if it was there was just one mode and of all modes the lamest that being Adventure mode.
quote RegalBryantI wasn't talking about Adventure Mode. I was just mentioning the point of Smash Bros. Plus, even if Adventure Mode didn't let you play with friends and family, its still has history.Playing with your friends and family, which you couldn't do if all it had was Adventure Mode?
Powered by neoforums v2.2.0c (toro)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2014