Thread titleFromLast replied
Now searching...
Neoseeker Forums » » » Civilization IV » newcomer » Post Reply

REPLY TO A THREAD
Name:* Members, please LOGIN before posting
Email: We use this to display your Gravatar

Sign in with
Subject:*
Message:*


HTML is not allowed
markup is allowed

Help with markup tags

Enabling Buttons in IE7



Smilies:
  ·all smilies here
:) :P ;) :( :| ;( :D :confused: :cool: :# :o ^_^ :colored: :thick:
Note to Guests: For the enjoyment of other visitors, and to help keep this forum tidy and working smoothly, please make sure you search the forum before posting your question.

Thread Recap (last 10 posts from newest to oldest)

Jul 12, 09 at 1:41am
Krunal


I feel that risk is very much a game of it's own and much different to Civilisations, the fact that there are multiple ways to win, multiples way to get a better army, and no roll of a dice to worry about, Civ for me is the better choice, though I do love risk as well (played two games just a fortnight ago and won both infact), Civ will take far longer than a Risk. and if you ever fall for the 'just one more turn' routine, you may never be able to put down civ ever again...





Jul 11, 09 at 9:58am
pasmon


Hey i was just trying out the civilization demo. I am a very fond player of rts games like age of empires,command and conquers.
Civilization is as if risk type fetaures embeeded in age of empires. I found "risk" more "near to home" than "civilization"(that i have played risk several times with my cousins).
Civilization is a pretty and famous games with good music but i just cannot swallow it.



Powered by neoforums v2.0.3 (toro)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2014

Neoseeker.com   |   Forum Rules   |   Forum FAQ   |   Neoseeker Terms of Use   |   Supermods On Duty [ server id: web8 ··· elapsed: 0.2591]
Chat and Lounges
Game Platforms
Mobile Platforms