He was a toy in the 1980s. He was usable in 2 games. Although he pretty much sucked, don't mock him. It's partly thanks to him that NES flourished so much in North-America, making Nintendo big-time.
I was already aware of R.O.B. being used as an original NES hardware attatchment back in the day. And I wasn't putting him down, I was commenting on how awkward of a character he is in MKDS.
Mar 12, 09 at 9:13pm
Zumma
He was a toy in the 1980s. He was usable in 2 games. Although he pretty much sucked, don't mock him. It's partly thanks to him that NES flourished so much in North-America, making Nintendo big-time.
Pit has only been in one game, which I might add I had never heard of before. In fact, ROB also was in few games, but it was still added. If they added Zant, enough people would know from where he came from, along with the other characters I mentioned. Even if they added a Zora or a Goron... IDEA!!!
Character: Deku Link, Zora Link, and Goron Link. Kinda like Pokemon trainer, just with masks. No middle person, just switch between the three.
Whaddya think? Should we put a ring on it?
Considering I know these characters originate from a popular and well-known franchise and recognize their features at first glance, I'd say this wouldn't be a bad idea to replace Pit and/or R.O.B. with examples such as these.
You could never get sick of Zelda characters, although it'd be pointless to add any more as only Zelda, Link and Ganon have been in enough games to be obvious to people that they're from that franchise.
Pit has only been in one game, which I might add I had never heard of before. In fact, ROB also was in few games, but it was still added. If they added Zant, enough people would know from where he came from, along with the other characters I mentioned. Even if they added a Zora or a Goron... IDEA!!!
Character: Deku Link, Zora Link, and Goron Link. Kinda like Pokemon trainer, just with masks. No middle person, just switch between the three.
Charizard's actually the strongest out of the three PT pokemon, and on its own would possibly be high up on the tiers, as it has good match-ups and awesome killing strength, etc.
Since this was an opinion of mine, I didn't type that post as a fact, and I never said that Charizard lacked superior "killing strength" in the least.
quote IM
The fact that you HAVE to use the other pokemon due to fatigue is what drags it down.
Exactly, I never brought that up as not true.
Thus:
quote DXD
I think it would've been better if Nintendo switched the Pokemon Trainer's Pokemon forms around to make it: Bulbasaur, Charmeleon, Blastoise
quote IM
It's not surprising. He has no agility...
"OPINION": compared to Charizard's jumping and midair attack speed, he does.
Powered by neoforums v1.6.5b (aperture) Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2013