Thread titleFromLast replied
Now searching...
Neoseeker Forums » » » » Call of Duty: World at War » Call of duty 5 - should it be... » Post Reply

hideOriginal Post

Nov 14, 08 at 12:49pmtrundley


Who thinks call of duty 5 should have been an extension of call of duty 4 It's just kind of stupid that they've went back to the clunky 1940's hardware when they could use real life army campaigns to make COD 5. and they could have way improved it by being able to switch between 1st person and 3rd person

Thread Recap (last 10 posts from newest to oldest)

Apr 6, 09 at 7:47pm
dfk


the way i look at it is that each one is a cod so waw is still cod5 it just goes back in time really thats all

though i prefer up to date shoot ups



Dec 6, 08 at 4:51pm
0172


I guess, if you look at it that way.



Dec 6, 08 at 4:49pm
Centanu


Which will actually be called CoD5.



Dec 6, 08 at 4:38pm
0172


quote brownsrock
Well, This CoD was made by the same team that mad CoD3, and a different one made CoD4, which is why this probably happened. I have heard that CoD6 will be back in the Modern areas of war, which really means nothing because its what I "heard" so yeah.
Treyarch developed CoD3 and WaW, and Infinity Ward, the original developer of the series, developed CoD4. Yes, CoD6 will be modern warfare.



Dec 6, 08 at 2:25pm
Centanu


quote KrazyKain
Call of duty started in WW2 so why shouldnt it continue in ww2?!

I'm happy with waw being ww2.. now wether its 5 or not.. i dont care, but i do refer to it as cod5
Good luck with that when CoD5 comes out.



Dec 6, 08 at 5:32am
Cobalt


Well, This CoD was made by the same team that mad CoD3, and a different one made CoD4, which is why this probably happened. I have heard that CoD6 will be back in the Modern areas of war, which really means nothing because its what I "heard" so yeah.



Dec 6, 08 at 1:36am
0172


quote trundley
and they could have way improved it by being able to switch between 1st person and 3rd person
Sorry, but that would never happen. Call of Duty has and always will be an FPS series.



Dec 6, 08 at 12:43am
KrazyKain


Call of duty started in WW2 so why shouldnt it continue in ww2?!

I'm happy with waw being ww2.. now wether its 5 or not.. i dont care, but i do refer to it as cod5



Dec 4, 08 at 11:39pm
Centanu


Nowhere official will you hear it called COD5. Also, people who are so into modern fighting that they consider WWII games 'clunky old weaponry' are idiots. The oldies are some of the coolest. Hell, gangsters used Thompsons. Do gangsters use M16's? No, no they dont.

I will agree that WWII is pretty overplayed. However, WaW is epic on the DS, and I've heard mixed reviews for the other systems.

Unless I'm mistaken, the game to take the title of COD5 will be another modern one.



Dec 4, 08 at 11:31pm
NoScoped


quote trundley
Who thinks call of duty 5 should have been an extension of call of duty 4 It's just kind of stupid that they've went back to the clunky 1940's hardware when they could use real life army campaigns to make COD 5. and they could have way improved it by being able to switch between 1st person and 3rd person
Lol! L2English.

And by the way, CoD:4 DS can't compare to this. WW:2 setting is much better on the DS. Not the bigger consoles.



Powered by neoforums v2.3.10 (Bolieve)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2016

Neoseeker.com   |   Forum Rules   |   Forum FAQ   |   Neoseeker Terms of Use   |   Supermods On Duty [ server id: www1 ··· elapsed: 0.0812]
Chat and Lounges
Game Platforms
Mobile Platforms