quote ByRoSet your HT Multiplier to 3 instead of 4. having it at 4 gives you an HT bus of 1132 which is to high, most AMD Comps become unstable pretty much anything over 1GHz. 3X will give you an HT of 849 (You will not notice a difference in performance from 1000 to 849, especially since your OC'ed
Your lucky to get yours that high actually..
Are you using 12X multi???
quote Blackenedcare to explain why AMD should offer there Quadcore for Sub100 when Intel's Q6600 is no faster than it and costs more? Quite honestly your being a moron.Candle, after reading the article below You may want to reconsider Your statement that "Phonem is where its at". That B3 stepping had better be one serious monster or AMD is going to have to sell the X4 Phenoms for <$100..
Link to "TLB Fix" performance:
I just upgraded from an S939 X2 3800+ system, before that the single core 3500+, and before that an XP 3200, and before that a XP 2500 and before that a K6-400(I think it was a 400 anyway its been a long time) and when I got my money together to buy a new system last month, what do you think I bought? My E6550 is OC'd to 3.6Ghz and would have pounded every one of these CPUs into oblivion in everything except some of the synthetic memory benchmarks that AMD always wins. Now that was the best $163 I ever spent, although when I bought my X2 it was about the same price and was a damn good buy, the Intel blows it out of the water. AMD has a LONG way to go to bring back some of its old customers like me because when I go to quad, will I just buy another Intel to drop in my current system or will AMD be so goo that I scrap everything and go with AMD? Sadly, I don't think the latter will ever happen.
Powered by neoforums v2.3.6b (Bolieve)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2015