What I had expected...

Forum Options:	my.neoforum register members prefs search faq

Topic: What I had expected... Options: Print subscribe remove NeoPM
Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest »
Speed Demon Founder Of Divine Illusionary Underworld member: postin' posse total posts: 570 since: Jul 2009	Nov 07, 11 at 4:26pm ^ What I had expected...
	Log in to remove this sponsored message Yea, the game DID offer a nice storyline. Fluid graphics and awesome gameplay. Just one thing it lacked was the combat system. It didn't impress me that much. On the contrary, BF3 Combat system was a top notch! What do you guys think about this? ------------------- Im the master of my unspoken words,and slave to that should have remained unspoken
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Advertisement Neoseeker	^ Sponsored message

	Log in or register to remove this sponsored message
TheOriginal Balotelli's Biggest Fan. threadnought total posts: 629 since: Sep 2011	Nov 07, 11 at 4:32pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	saywutnow? ------------------- Why Always Me?
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
sephiroth_campbell ultra seeker total posts: 1463 since: Mar 2010	Nov 07, 11 at 6:57pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote Speed Demon BF3 Combat system was a top notch! thats your givaway...BF3 combat system was far from top notch, they say no one shot kills, but it happens. the knifing motion was about 5 minutes long the snipers where underpowered the guns where retarded (sniping with pistols ect...) the actual system people used was bullshit, mainly camping the objective..... what part was good.....oh yeah the "realistic sound penetrarion when YOU got shot" i aint no fanboy of either companies, i just notice the bullshit -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Chrono N'Somniac since: Dec 2010	Nov 07, 11 at 7:01pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote sephiroth_campbell thats your givaway...BF3 combat system was far from top notch, they say no one shot kills, but it happens. the knifing motion was about 5 minutes long the snipers where underpowered the guns where retarded (sniping with pistols ect...) the actual system people used was bullshit, mainly camping the objective..... what part was good.....oh yeah the "realistic sound penetrarion when YOU got shot" i aint no fanboy of either companies, i just notice the bullshit - Snipers were nerfed because they'd be whored so heavy if they were one-shot kills. And if you hit them in the head, like a good sniper should, you get a one shot kill. - Lol, guns in BF3 are way balanced compared to a CoD game. - Battlefield is more of a sim shooter than arcade style. When I play, I play to win. It's a realistic game so scouting out the area near an objective is the best way to win. Running around like a chicken without a head in BF3 (like a person would in CoD) is a good way to go 0-20. It's not camping if it's objective gameplay. edit: By no means am I bashing you for having problems with the game, I just think you were expecting a game similar to Call of Duty. Past BF's should've revealed that BF3 would not be anything like CoD. If that's why you were upset by the game, it's understandable, but overall, they made a great game with few problems. The server issues have been my only complaint. ------------------- last.fm
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
sephiroth_campbell ultra seeker total posts: 1463 since: Mar 2010	Nov 07, 11 at 7:10pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote Chrono quote sephiroth_campbell thats your givaway...BF3 combat system was far from top notch, they say no one shot kills, but it happens. the knifing motion was about 5 minutes long the snipers where underpowered the guns where retarded (sniping with pistols ect...) the actual system people used was bullshit, mainly camping the objective..... what part was good.....oh yeah the "realistic sound penetrarion when YOU got shot" i aint no fanboy of either companies, i just notice the bullshit - Snipers were nerfed because they'd be whored so heavy if they were one-shot kills. And if you hit them in the head, like a good sniper should, you get a one shot kill. - Lol, guns in BF3 are way balanced compared to a CoD game. - Battlefield is more of a sim shooter than arcade style. When I play, I play to win. It's a realistic game so scouting out the area near an objective is the best way to win. Running around like a chicken without a head in BF3 (like a person would in CoD) is a good way to go 0-20. It's not camping if it's objective gameplay. guns way more balanced....k BF3 is the only game i have EVER known to get one shotted with a pistol...any other places 2 maybe 3 bullets...umad?? if your gonna play the whole but CoD is an arcade shooter then why not stop using the actual gameplay and the combat system eh? after all if thats what your saying ok how about the 10 million mile maps? running and wasting 5 minutes of your life atually getting to A and BAM camped at the objective...k the gameplay is better ¬¬ fair enough on the snipers, but what about when they are running around like headless chickens? but no-no-no-no its a different game....K. sounds quite codish dont it? i could sit here and splurt the amount wrong with BF3 but i wont as the neo server would more than likely die.... im not saying that CoD will be better im just saying anyone that says BF3 is even a decent game has got to be silly. and people like you that compare it to cod are even more silly as they are two VERRY different games. as you said one is arcade one is a simulation...how can you compare them? like a potato to a pineapple.... -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Chrono N'Somniac since: Dec 2010	Nov 07, 11 at 7:16pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote sephiroth_campbell and people like you that compare it to cod are even more silly as they are two VERRY different games. I never compared them man. I could even dig up a post I've made about people arguing the two. If you look at my post (and my edit that I made) you'll see that I was only discussing Battlefield. I only mentioned CoD in mentioning that maybe you were expecting Call of Duty. To answer your problem with pistols in the game, health regenerates fairly slowly. I have never been truly "one shotted" by a pistol in this game. If you get shot a couple times, and are around 10% health, it won't regenerate right away. It's possible that's when you took the damage. I also don't remember ever claiming that Battlefield's gameplay is in any way better. I personally like it more. Big maps are part of Battlefield, always have been. By changing that they would've pissed off ass loads of their fanbase. I enjoy the real war feel of running up to defend an objective or tactically coordinating with my team to breach into a room to lock down the objective. I'm not arguing that CoD is bad, that we should compare the two. I am, however, arguing that Battlefield is a really solid game. Of course, this is opinion because the term "decent game" is subjective to one's own opinion. The only thing I will "bash" you on is your claim about anyone who "says BF3 is a decent game" being "silly". That's subjective. Plenty of people think CoD is silly. ------------------- last.fm
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
john_4 s-e-e-k-e-r total posts: 1590 since: Feb 2007	Nov 07, 11 at 7:18pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote sephiroth_campbell [quote=Chrono\|message:32209035][quote=sephiroth_campbell\|message:32209019] guns way more balanced....k BF3 is the only game i have EVER known to get one shotted with a pistol...any other places 2 maybe 3 bullets...umad?? doesnt happen, unless you had already taken damage else where
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Silent_Crow Dominating Since 1995 member: postin' posse total posts: 545 since: Dec 2007	Nov 07, 11 at 8:04pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote sephiroth_campbell quote Speed Demon BF3 Combat system was a top notch! thats your givaway...BF3 combat system was far from top notch, they say no one shot kills, but it happens. the knifing motion was about 5 minutes long the snipers where underpowered the guns where retarded (sniping with pistols ect...) the actual system people used was bullshit, mainly camping the objective..... what part was good.....oh yeah the "realistic sound penetrarion when YOU got shot" i aint no fanboy of either companies, i just notice the bullshit I really enjoyed the snipers in BC2 as they trained me to get nothing but headshots otherwise you dont really have enough time to take two shots My only problem was the shotguns were quite ridiculous -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Faded *Robert bleeping Bowling* Two much Neo total posts: 2311 since: Jul 2009	Nov 07, 11 at 8:48pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	My god, these Battlefield fanboys are malicious. God damn, just leave now. -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Yogurt The Red Devils! ChaChaLaLa Resident Neo total posts: 2791 since: May 2008	Nov 07, 11 at 9:34pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	Both are fun... Both have their ups... Both have their downs... You say the story, gameplay and graphics of MW3 are good. BF3's (aside from grahpics) wasn't so good (I know it's multiplayer based, but so is CoD). Like I said both are fun in their different way, I just like CoD better. ------------------- TimeSplitters 2 HD remake pls.
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Chrono N'Somniac since: Dec 2010	Nov 07, 11 at 9:47pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote Faded My god, these Battlefield fanboys are malicious. God damn, just leave now. If you're targeting this quote on me, I was simply stating that I feel that sephiroth is wrong in saying that Battlefield was an "atrocious" game. I'm in no way a fanboy. This is my first Battlefield. Am I loving it? Yes. I hate being called a fanboy. I was just correcting him on some stuff in which he was clearly wrong. You can't just say the gameplay is shit because it's not the kind of gameplay you like. Can't you see where I'm coming from? It's all opinion. Of course some people don't like the way it plays. I'm in no way a fanboy. ------------------- last.fm
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Faded *Robert bleeping Bowling* Two much Neo total posts: 2311 since: Jul 2009	Nov 07, 11 at 10:06pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote Chrono quote Faded My god, these Battlefield fanboys are malicious. God damn, just leave now. If you're targeting this quote on me, I was simply stating that I feel that sephiroth is wrong in saying that Battlefield was an "atrocious" game. I'm in no way a fanboy. This is my first Battlefield. Am I loving it? Yes. I hate being called a fanboy. I was just correcting him on some stuff in which he was clearly wrong. You can't just say the gameplay is shit because it's not the kind of gameplay you like. Can't you see where I'm coming from? It's all opinion. Of course some people don't like the way it plays. I'm in no way a fanboy. Nah, not you. The OP, I meant. -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Whelan True Addiction wiki super neowiki since: Dec 2003	Nov 07, 11 at 10:12pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote sephiroth_campbell guns way more balanced....k BF3 is the only game i have EVER known to get one shotted with a pistol...any other places 2 maybe 3 bullets...umad?? you're on low health already and/or bullet registration lag. You must have forgot about MW2 with their insane pistols that were virtually primaries. You can also easily snipe with pistols on MW2. quote sephiroth_campbell after all if thats what your saying ok how about the 10 million mile maps? running and wasting 5 minutes of your life atually getting to A and BAM camped at the objective...k the gameplay is better ¬¬ I dunno what objective you're running to if it takes 10 minutes. Also use a vehicle, there's tons of them. To be honest I could say the same about COD. I mean I've enjoyed both series, and I'm a beast at both to say the least but I find COD way more frustrating.
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Chrono N'Somniac since: Dec 2010	Nov 08, 11 at 12:22pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote Faded Nah, not you. The OP, I meant. Sarcasm now? Come on man. OP is CoD fanboy. Call me what you want. I don't mind. ------------------- last.fm
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Faded *Robert bleeping Bowling* Two much Neo total posts: 2311 since: Jul 2009	Nov 08, 11 at 12:59pm ^ re: What I had expected...
	quote Chrono quote Faded Nah, not you. The OP, I meant. Sarcasm now? Come on man. OP is CoD fanboy. Call me what you want. I don't mind. quote Yea, the game DID offer a nice storyline. Fluid graphics and awesome gameplay. Just one thing it lacked was the combat system. It didn't impress me that much. On the contrary, BF3 Combat system was a top notch!What do you guys think about this? Whatchu talkin' 'bout Willis? -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
[All dates in (PST) time]	Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest »

Thread title	From	Last replied
Now searching...

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 PC 360 PS3 Wii

Hobbies

Sports

Skills

Chat and Lounges

Game Platforms

Mobile Platforms

Top Core Games

Top Portable Games

Top Communities