Topic: Ranking System
|
|
|
The Rock 13Seeketh Maximus wiki stafffifa   total posts: 5147 neopoints: 101 since: May 2006
|
 Apr 03, 08 at 9:00am
Ranking System
|
I'm not sure if it was Smackdown! or Smackdown! 2 but one of them had a ranking system for the title's which I used to think was quite cool.
I'm not sure how they woudl use it but could it be included in 09?
-------------------
|
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
|
|
Members, log in or register to remove these ads.
|
Zhou Tai Rockslol KanyeNeo: Essential     total posts: 12956 GameGrep pts: 601 since: Nov 2005
|
 Apr 03, 08 at 12:45pm
re: Ranking System
|
They both had it, just different styles. Smackdown 1 had it where each superstar would gain or lose status(up to 100, down to 0) depending on whether they won or lost a match. Smackdown 2 had the top five contenders for each title, I believe. Either way, I would love for both of these editions to be added to the game, especially the first one simply for exhibition.
------------------- IRP: Home of the Whopper Mafia Games .......and the blode...
|
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
|
SecretLegendI WILL SURVIVEs-e-e-k-e-r    total posts: 1631 since: Jan 2008
|
 Apr 03, 08 at 12:49pm
re: Ranking System
|
Finally, ZTR.
I love you!

------------------- I just want you to know who I am People talk about me baby OGUN
|
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
|
The HazardLiquor at the front, poker in the rearLegendary Seeker wiki staffsmackdown    total posts: 15335 GameGrep pts: 226 since: May 2005
|
 Apr 16, 08 at 3:34pm
re: Ranking System
|
Back then, that system(2nd ranking system) was put up so there would truly be a no.1 contender and such, because unless I'm deeply mistaken, in the Attitude era, I think the "no.1 contender" title was more valued.
These days, you're just called the number one contender as soon as you get a title shot. But back then, for example if the champion lost the belt, he's automatically the number one contender and someone else had to beat him to get that spot(and so on).
The question is, would gamers in general like to see that return? I would be guessing no because the system has disappeared and people are used to it. People won't be used to always making triple threat matches in exhibition so that their favorite to win the belt will get to win it in one move instead of going through the motions.
As for the first ranking system... there would ultimately have to be an outcome or an effect coming out of that, just a bunch of numbers showing for it would get tedious at the end.
-------------------
|
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
|
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |