Moderator's Corner

I think award for most annoying member is done and gone. Leave arrogant separate.

quote Sah_Kuh_Suckers

Hell, we could have a MH version of SPIKE tv's "Deadliest Warrior" here.

I want to bring this up again. It would be like the debate thread, except you'd argue exclusively who would win? And you'd have someone write up the simulated fight+victor.

examples:

5-man Town Guardian Squad versus 5-man Guild Knight Shadow assassination squad.
Lao versus Gao

Crag and Clust shots would be the main way for the Shadows to break the Guards Shields. Crag first, hit them at their feet with a clust when they're stumbling back from the impact. It would be indicative of the under-handed, "gang-up style" since you need two people to operate a crag-clust combo.


And I see Heavy Bowguns as like a sniper rifle. Who needs "light stealth" when you're a 500ft away from battle, and inside a shaded area? I arranged the two to fighting styles. Bows you get out, fire, and keep moving. A very direct, un-sneaky way to fight. But the Heavy bowgun you stay put, and move only when you have to. Bows are similar to LBGs, but LBGs have that silencer aspect which makes them sneakier.

quote Xeros_the_Slayer

These are people that can brush off getting trampled by 5 tons of fangs and claws.

Of course, some realism has to be implemented to move things along. For example, Greatsword: One hit-kill. Hammer: One hit kill, with some attacks. But I'd like to see a Guard fight with a round the size of his face sticking out of his armor.

Anyways, these are points that the debaters should be making.
Basically, you would be assigned a team, and you debate over which side would win. It would be to a team's advantage to cover all of their weapons, (Or monster abilities) and rebut all of their opponent's points but it's largely free-style.