quote

Thats only because the GBA doesnt have the ability to do all that. Im sure if it did it probroby have better

32 Bits, but it isn't made to handle 3d. But they can make 2d images look like 3d. But, GBA can hold twice as much as a SNES. And TO:LUCT came out one SFC(SNES), and that game is huge. So I'm sure they could have did it. But I think it was toned down more since it is a portable, and portables don't seem to have huge worlds to explore. 50 hours games and stuff like that. This may change some of it though.

Well i have just read that FFT shall most likely be comin to GBA because Square and Nintendo have made up. So I think that will be the ultimate test to see wich company can make the best of the GBA.

FFT is already coming to GBA. But it's different. They changed it enough so it isn't considered a port. It's like, umm... I dunno, different in ways. Most likely the same game though. And Square aquired the rights to the Ogre Battle Saga from Quest. So this is the last Quest made Ogre Battle game. I'm sorta dissapointed with that though since I already own like every Square game and I like have something that doesn't say Sqaresoft on it. But on the plus side, Square has some of the same team that made the original Tactics Ogre. And right now the leader of that team is working on Final Fantasy XII so don't expect another Ogre Battle game for 2 or 3 years. And I hope they don't milk the series like Final Fantasy. And I think they ruined the Seiken Densetsu series. Square is going downhill. I'm rambling on.

I think that is part of the reason why Square made amends with Nintendo.They needed something to fall back on, and Nintendo has this deal called Fund Q that basically
helps you finance games if you make games that will support the link feature through GC and GBA.That's way off subject though.
On subject, FFT was a great game, and it takes a great game to be better than it, but if I was a betting man, i would diffently put my money on Tactics Ogre.
BTW~I'm not a betting man.I'm not old enough to gamble.

I believe this game is better than Final Fantasy tatics and Final Fantasy Tatics Advance.

I just love that face

I really liked this game but it just didn't hit the same highs as FFT for me which had a much better overall plot and more immersive character development in my opinion

actually they are both good games but tactics has that movable screen so you could always tell where to fire the magic attack. i'm sure some of you have hit your own men with a fireball attack once or twice in tactics ogre and why? because of the fixed camera angle

Wow, this is seriously a trip into the past for me.

I haven't been to this forum in years, but I saw some activity and wanted to read into it.

Lots of people say that Final Fantasy Tactics is better, and I would have to agree.

I have replayed FFT many times, and after I beat Tactics Ogre, I put it down and never picked it up.

FFTA is a better GBA tactics game than TO.

TO was fun though, it just got tedious.

They are both great.The same level of gaming.Even though I think AW,AW2 are better.

i would have to say.... yea, FFT

I find FFTA bland with annoying music, annoying characters and ridiculous skills like "ultima". I also prefer the mood of TO.

Tactic's ogre is the best game on the Game boy Advance.

imo