re: World War III ^ 2 - Page 7 - Thinker's Lounge

Forum Options:	my.neoforum register members prefs search faq

Topic: World War III ^ 2 Options: Print subscribe remove NeoPM
Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest »
Maxter_D From the muddy banks of the Ohio starting to like it total posts: 63 since: Jul 2005	Aug 21, 05 at 12:18am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	Log in to remove this sponsored message Yeah, you're probably right. I just read it and thought "holy crap" -------------------
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Dragonlord999 I am your master...obey! Hooked on Neo total posts: 4431 since: Feb 2004	Aug 21, 05 at 12:20am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	Isn't it amazing how easily some people can be fooled? ------------------- 飞雪连天射白鹿 . . . . . . 笑书神侠倚碧鸳
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
severedlimb03 Vieslàv... just getting started! total posts: 129 since: Jul 2005	Aug 21, 05 at 12:22am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	Somebody's posted it over in Loungin' (I kinda got banned for a week...)
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Ragnorak191914 Try me. true seeker total posts: 1185 since: Oct 2004	Aug 21, 05 at 4:48am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	quote Dragonlord999 that scenario is kinda funny though: w00t, Chinese power! but seriously, china will not launch a mass scale war campaign unless threatened by some outside force. China won't opt for world domination anytime in the near future... The Americans, on the other hand...coughcrazy presidentscough Yeah, like America is going to go on a long campaign of world domination due to crazy presidents? We already execute some imperialistic actions, and any president deciding to progress so foolishly would be a prime candidate for impeachment. ------------------- What would it be like to be you? I only wish that I could imagine..
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Dragonlord999 I am your master...obey! Hooked on Neo total posts: 4431 since: Feb 2004	Aug 21, 05 at 5:21am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	Unless this "hypothetical" president happens to have congress in his pockets... ------------------- 飞雪连天射白鹿 . . . . . . 笑书神侠倚碧鸳
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Ninjanaut dangerous since: Jul 2005	Aug 21, 05 at 10:30am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	quote Ragnorak191914 Yeah, like America is going to go on a long campaign of world domination due to crazy presidents? We already execute some imperialistic actions, and any president deciding to progress so foolishly would be a prime candidate for impeachment. Are you sure they don't get rewarded with second terms instead? ------------------- I kick bitches in their ass reboot 'em like laptops And they wouldn't even box if I gave 'em a flat top
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Ragnorak191914 Try me. true seeker total posts: 1185 since: Oct 2004	Aug 23, 05 at 2:38am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	Do you really have to continue this useless libel about meaningless wars and rewards for what you see to be unjust actions? Besides, eventually if a great majority was prepared to stop an all out conquest for domination, even of citizen or non-congress members, the president and this hypothetical, psycho president could be stopped. Besides, such a man would not be voted into office, and such a congress to support a pyscho president would likewise, not be in power. There would be too great of fear. ------------------- What would it be like to be you? I only wish that I could imagine..
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Dragonlord999 I am your master...obey! Hooked on Neo total posts: 4431 since: Feb 2004	Aug 23, 05 at 3:21am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	You never know what might or might not happen in politics: every possiblity is possible. ------------------- 飞雪连天射白鹿 . . . . . . 笑书神侠倚碧鸳
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Kaziaa Damn You's a Sexy Bitch threadnought total posts: 668 since: Jul 2002	Aug 23, 05 at 3:31am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	The only real reason we would be having another big war is for energy or power. Unless we can find a new big power source soon war will probably happen. China would not attack us for populations and land expantion, but more likely for refunding their almost gone coal supplies which we still have (not much but enough). But otherwise there is no other big reason for a big world war except power. side note-there are so many bleeping anti-bush people here, it is annoying ------------------- Please sign my Guest Book!!!
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Deis I - I wasn't sober...and you told me... True Addiction total posts: 17674 neopoints: 2788 GameGrep pts: 618 since: Apr 2004	Aug 23, 05 at 3:42am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	quote Kaziaa side note-there are so many bleeping anti-bush people here, it is annoying Find something good to say about him then. ------------------- The Krav Vegan I am a Slut - and here's why
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
severedlimb03 Vieslàv... just getting started! total posts: 129 since: Jul 2005	Aug 23, 05 at 2:20pm ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	quote Yunalookalike quote Kaziaa side note-there are so many bleeping anti-bush people here, it is annoying Find something good to say about him then. His suits aren't too bad... no, no... I take that back... quote Ragnorak191914 Do you really have to continue this useless libel about meaningless wars and rewards for what you see to be unjust actions? Meaningless? Yes, what's the point in concentrating on all the faults of the government? Let's focus on the good in people! quote Ragnorak191914 Besides, such a man would not be voted into office Something Al Gore knows all too well... quote Ragnorak191914 and such a congress to support a pyscho president would likewise, not be in power. There would be too great of fear. Not if the fear was concentrated on someone else... a threat for instance. Fear is a powerful things and the reason for many, MANY actions. Black lynchings, witch burning and war... If congress etc. were given a reason, fact of fiction, they might support such things... like being told they were under threat from another country. WMD etc.
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
0_o Two much Neo since: May 2004	Jul 14, 06 at 1:50am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	We could seriously be heading toward a World War III. Lebanon and Israel are going to start a World War III. Two more Mideast countries might get involved, two being Iran and Syria. North Korea has been launching missles. China wants to take over Taiwan. USA supports Israel's retaliatory attacks, France, Russia and the UN do not.
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Tolemo Then that shall be your Epitaph! N'Somniac total posts: 4880 since: Aug 2004	Jul 14, 06 at 1:51am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	ww3 is coming! ------------------- Mace Windu, Shaak Ti, Aayla Secura
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
RedFoxBandit Now Under Username "Tribulation" Resident Neo total posts: 2891 neopoints: 156 since: Jan 2002	Jul 14, 06 at 2:04am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	quote 0_o Lebanon and Israel are going to start a World War III. Lebanon doesn't have any military strength to stand up to Israel, and any Arab country will find itself in a pickle if they do anything to provoke Israeli miltiary action. The Israeli Air Force is one of the most highly trained air forces in the world, and has the highest kill-death ratio for any military service in the world. If I'm not mistaken, Israel went up against 7 nations in the Arab-Israeli War, and that was 1967. Their military is much better organized now and has superior equipment - they can hold their own until international backing. quote 0_o Two more Mideast countries might get involved, two being Iran and Syria. Iran has pledged that it will not get involved unless a direct attack on Syria occurs; only way Syria gets involved is if Israel pushes through Eastern Jerusalem or the West Bank. quote 0_o North Korea has been launching missles. So has the USA, Russia, France, and Britain. Big woop, I'm tired of the media going nuts after a nation tests a missile. I didn't see FOX going nuts when we tested the RIM-124, a missile capable of being launched from US fighter aircraft that could reach Saigon from California? quote 0_o China wants to take over Taiwan. Not without international support. Republic of China is stationed in Taiwan and has been fighting the PRC for YEARS. An amphibious invasion of the RoC would take years to plan out as well, and would ultimately fail. Russia has a huge trade contract with the RoC, I doubt they'd like to see that go bottoms up. quote 0_o USA supports Israel's retaliatory attacks, France, Russia and the UN do not. Condemnations and arguments mean shit in the world of politics. USA supports drinking beer with pretzels, Russia, France and the UN don't! OMG WW3! ------------------- Under Username "Tribulation"
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Tolemo Then that shall be your Epitaph! N'Somniac total posts: 4880 since: Aug 2004	Jul 14, 06 at 5:32am ^ re: World War III ^ 2
	You then Iran will hold up to their pledge? You also think that NK is stable, and not rash enough to do something? We are dealing with countries that are just instable with the leaders. They would want to do anything to get more power. You put to much faith in a countries words. ------------------- Mace Windu, Shaak Ti, Aayla Secura
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
[All dates in (PST) time]	Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest »

Thread title	From	Last replied
Now searching...

World War III ^ 2 - Page 7

Hobbies

Sports

Skills

Chat and Lounges

Game Platforms

Mobile Platforms

Top Core Games

Top Portable Games

Top Communities