Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 mini icon

Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0

73

Based on 1 reviews

  • Good
    0
  • Average
    1
  • Bad
    0
N/A

Users Score Review This

  • Good
    0
  • Average
    0
  • Bad
    0

About this Product

Reviews

Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 Reviews Rating: 73 out of 100 based on 1 rating.

Meta Reviews

website score publish date article quality
APH Networks 7.3/10 Dec 30 '11
eTeknix.com  --- Dec 15 '11
Legion Hardware  --- Apr 10 '12
Techgage  --- Dec 30 '11
X-bit labs  --- Jan 17 '12
Submit a review link

APH Networks on

"Delivering excellent results in sequential read and write benchmarks, the only problem I had with the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 64GB is, once again, somewhat disappointing small file..."

Read full review

eTeknix.com on

"Price wise, you won’t see much change out of £120, but it comes back to that age old saying “If you want the best, you’ll have to pay for it” and so far, this really is the best in terms of looks..."

Read full review

Legion Hardware on

"Overall the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 64GB looks to be a solid product, we just wish it was a little more competitively priced."

Read full review

Techgage on

"If you're data transfer needs are simple, in that you aren't copying over thousands of files to your drive on a regular basis, the HyperX 3.0 is the drive to get. If the opposite is true, the OCZ..."

Read full review

X-bit labs on

"Thus, a RAID0 will only be superior to a single SSD at linear operations whereas random-address operations will expose its weakness. That’s why we can’t prefer the RAID0 solution to a single SSD..."

Read full review
$  Compare Prices
(0.0584/d/web6)