AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ mini icon

AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+

85

Based on 2 reviews

  • Good
    2
  • Average
    0
  • Bad
    0
100

Users Score Review This

  • Good
    1
  • Average
    0
  • Bad
    0

About the Product

The Socket 939 Athlon 64 X2 3800+ with AMD64 architecture (32-bit compatible) is based on dual K8 Manchester cores of 0.09 micron processors. It operates at a frequency of 2Ghz, with a 1600MHz FSB (via integrated memory controller). The processor features 256K L1 cache, 1024KB L2 cache per core, 6.4GB/s memory bandwidth, 24GB/s HyperTransport bandwidth (single link), and SSE3 multimedia instructions.

Reviews

AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Reviews Rating: 90 out of 100 based on 2 ratings. 1 user review.

User Reviews

review score by date
yagijd 10/10 yagijd Nov 13, 2005
View all User Reviews

Meta Reviews

website score publish date article quality
Neoseeker  --- Oct 12 '05
AMD Zone  --- Aug 01 '05
AMDboard  --- Nov 14 '05
Anandtech  --- Aug 01 '05
DriverHeaven  --- Oct 20 '05
Gamepyre  --- Jul 31 '05
HardwareLogic  --- Jan 30 '06
Hot Hardware  --- Aug 01 '05
LegitReviews.com  --- Aug 01 '05
Lost Circuits  --- Sep 20 '05
SharkyExtreme 9/10 Aug 01 '05
Tech Report  --- Aug 01 '05
Techware Labs  --- Aug 01 '05
TrustedReviews 8/10 Aug 12 '05
X-bit labs  --- Jul 31 '05
Submit a review link

AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Roundups and Shootouts

title website score publish date
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Review Hot Hardware -- Aug 02 '06
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Review K-Hardware -- Oct 16 '05
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Review PC Perspective -- Dec 26 '05
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Review Tech Report -- Aug 08 '06
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Review Tweak Town -- Apr 10 '06

AMD Zone on

"It is pretty clear that dual core is the way to go even when sacrificing some performance in single threaded apps. The MHz gap for AMD is not that large for the difference to be so pronounced. We..."

Read full review

AMDboard on

"In terms of overall performance, power efficiency, thermal waste, and overall smoothness, the X2-3800 is probably the best microprocessor currently available."

Read full review

Anandtech on

"We really didn't want to see AMD become a more expensive CPU manufacturer, and with the X2 3800+, we finally have a more sensibly priced dual core option. The choice is clear - the Athlon 64 X2..."

Read full review

DriverHeaven on

"Overall a very good product from AMD and it may be slightly more expensive than the Intel chip it competes with, however on the whole it performs better and is therefore good value. The excellent..."

Read full review

Gamepyre on

"...the 3800+ is squarely positioned against the 830D CPU from Intel. In every test, the 3800+ outperforms the 820D, the closest dual core Intel CPU I have, quite an accomplishment from AMD,..."

Read full review
$  Compare Prices
(0.0792/d/web2)