Average Review Score:
EliteGroup AG400T8-D64 Reviews
|website||score||publish date||article quality|
|Neoseeker||82%||Sep 26 '02|
|Active Hardware||---||Jul 23 '02|
|Hardware Test||---||Aug 15 '02|
|Legion Hardware||70%||Jul 23 '02|
|Mikhailtech||---||Aug 18 '02|
|OCWorkbench.com||4.6/5||Jul 21 '02|
|PC Stats||89%||Jul 22 '02|
|Planet Savage||---||Dec 26 '02|
|Sudhian Media||---||Oct 02 '02|
|t-break||87/100||Sep 04 '02|
|Tweakers Asylum||---||Aug 04 '02|
|»Submit a review link|
EliteGroup AG400T8-D64 Previews
|website||publish date||article rating|
|There are currently no previews. Click below to submit one.|
|» Submit a preview link|
Quoted from EliteGroup AG400T8-D64 Reviews:Check out these quotes from EliteGroup AG400T8-D64 reviews & previews
"The ECS AG400 offers great performance for a value card."
"ECS has done quite a good job with this card. Since it is based on SiS Xabre GPU, it also has a great price and a good performance."
"...the Xabre 400 GPU is most impressive and ECS have done well implementing this GPU with their AG400 card. The AG400 consistently out performed the MX440 card on a performance and value basis I believe."
"...this video card has me puzzled. Maybe I'm just dumb, but I see absolutely no pattern in the results. First the 3D Mark 2001 score is significantly higher. Then it wins at higher resolutions in VulpineGL. So far so good; could be a CPU vs. video card battle. Then we get to Serious Sam and the situation is reversed. Huh? If that wasn't bad enough, when I tested with Q3A I got the opposite results again. What?!? As for the numerous issues, it's hard to decide if they have anything to do with ECS's implementation or SiS's drivers and/or hardware."
"I RECOMMEND the card to users who are unhappy with their GeForce 4 MX cards and want a cheap and stable replacement."