NCAA March Madness 2004

THE BAD:
gets old after a while,

SUMMARY:
This game captured my intrests for a while but it gets boring after a while as well. The anouncers say the same things over and over and over again. The pro hop makes it unbeleivbly easy to get closer to the basket and get a layup.The game had tons of teams which was to my liking and had confrence tournaments NCAA,muia,and both NIT tourniments.I was a bit dissapointed that in the mascot game some of college teams weren't there.(I'm not sure how many) Includeing my favorite team. These probably doesn't bother other people but when I was setting up my schedule teams would say they didn't want to play me yet I asked them again and they said yes. And also when I was making my schedule I had won the national chapionship the year before with Kansas State and was ranked preseason #6 and I asked Syricuse and their response was 'Are you...

THE BAD:
When in doubt prohop to layup. Dificulty level jumps dramatically depending on the level you set the game at. No point at all to run a set offense

SUMMARY:
This is a fun game that adds some great visuals and some decent gameplay. Understand, I have always been one who prefers sports games that capture the feel of the game, and March Madness 2004 just doesn't quite do it. The pace is very very fast (but you can slow the game down with a slider) and the AI is what you would expect. The worse schools can't keep up with the best schools and that makes sense. What doesn't make sense is an inherant lack of offensive sets in the game. There are plenty of plays, but there is simply no point in using them. In fact in most cases the computers...