Pro Reviews
Average Review Score:
submit review Reviews: Nano Breaker
| website | score | publish date | article quality |
| Game Chronicles Magazine | 5.0/10 | Feb 23 '05 | |
| Game Critics | 2.5/10 | May 11 '05 | |
| GameDaily | 3/10 | Feb 22 '05 | |
| HonestGamers.com | 3/10 | Feb 27 '05 | |
| EuroGamer | 3/10 | Mar 01 '05 | |
| GamePro | 9.5/15 | Feb 15 '05 | |
| GameSpot | 5.5/10 | Feb 15 '05 | |
| Gamespy | 2.5/5 | Feb 14 '05 | |
| IGN PS2 | 4.5/10 | Feb 15 '05 | |
| »Submit a review link | |||
Previews
| website | publish date | article rating | |
| Gamespy | Jan 14 '04 | ||
| » Submit a preview link | |||
What They Say:
Check out these quotes from reviews & previews
"There's no end of things wrong with Nanobreaker. It's one of those games that seems to be actively trying to bore or frustrate you at every turn, and it's so charmless and poorly designed that it makes you wonder whether it was just that nobody had the heart to say anything. Only someone with minimal exposure to the genre could overlook its many flaws."
"No matter how hard you look, you won't be able to scrounge up much of anything to like about Nano Breaker."
"...it seems that Nanobreaker will feature a more robust implementation of many of the ideas that powered Lament, and will pack a gritty sci-fi sheen that should appeal."
"Whereas manly brawlers like Chaos Legion or Dynasty Warriors throw everything at you simultaneously, Nanobreaker doles its orgamechs out in small, easily-sliced clusters as if this were a really boring version of Streets of Rage or Final Fight."
"There is no reason to own or play Nano Breaker for any length of time. No single component of the game is particularly well done, nor is there any distinct portion of the title that can simply be labeled "good." More importantly, it was not fun, ever. If you try and recall just one instance of fun that you had throughout play you will come to a complete blank, guaranteed. As a videogame, Nano Breaker is then more of an unnecessary chore than an enjoyable pastime."