Unreal Tournament 2003

THE GOOD:
Many game types and weapons
Larger maps
Unlocking Malcolm, Brock and Lauren is pretty tough

THE BAD:
Takes up a ton of system resources
Changed the Sniper Rifle
Changed Domination style and removed Assault mode
Somehow seemed less 'fun'

SUMMARY:
UT2003 was the follow up to Unreal Tournament and again focused way more on the multiplayer element than a storyline. There was a single player mode again which was pretty much the same as it was in Unreal Tournament. Again the focus was more on trying to make the multiplayer option as good as possible.

When doing the single player campaign you would have to build up a team and every person had different statistics and they all were averaged out to give the team score. Fighting a team of robots is one of the hardest challenges because they have a very high average for the 4 statistics. You may notice that certain people are missing from the line up of...

THE GOOD:
-Alot of weopons
-Alot of multiplayer games
-I get to make fun of Clans hehe
-I have one word... Rampage....
-Insta kill
-Many maps (most maps ever)
-Alot of characters
-And its allllll online...

THE BAD:
Nothing exept those dam 56kers....It slows the game down and makes us Cable/DSL users slower...

SUMMARY:
Ok I play this game everyday. I hardly ever played the Single player because its really a Multiplayer game. My favorite game types are CTF and Team Deathmatch. I like the graphics and the looks of the levels. I think that no FPS can beat this game. All my friends have it and I have yet to see someone say it sucks. I cant wait for UT2004 if it ever comes out????

This game Is perfect and the only way it can get more perfect is with more maps and weopons and more gametypes...I give it a 5 out of 5

THE GOOD:
Nice graphics! much weapons, special moves, good single player mode and much multiplayer modes!

THE BAD:
Need powerfull PC, start lag easy.

SUMMARY:
Really good graphics and gameplay! Much weapons and maps! BUT need really good computer to run it good! Mine Duron 900 with 384mt ram and gf2 mx400 64mt is not enought to run last singleplayer map (it lags so much cant play it).
But anyway good game and i really recommend it if you have enought good PC to run it!

THE GOOD:
Graphics, gameplay, characters, weapons, levels and the single player mode.

THE BAD:
They have ruined the sniper rifle, need a good PC to run the game.

SUMMARY:
A great follow up to the first game, and they have improved a lot. They have left the gothic levels behind and gone for more industrial and outdoors. Levels from the first game are back and improved, and so are the weapons, apart from one. The sniper rifle is gone and is replaced by the feeble lightening gun.

If you like this kind of game and have a powerful PC, it's worth getting.

THE GOOD:
Decent graphics,gr8 gameplay much more added to the game...the ion painter!!!!!!

THE BAD:
Huge requirements(loadsa memory!)no sniper rifle.
not enough levels.

SUMMARY:
Very different from the original,yet almost the same:) an excellent game,a must buy for fps lovers.If you dont have a top of the range pc though...forget it.An excellent combination of indoor and outdoor maps 2.

THE GOOD:
Totally awesome graphics, better AI, slick guns, great levels. Need I say more?

THE BAD:
Too damn addictive, and they removed the old Sniper Rifle and the Redeemer.

SUMMARY:
This game totally rocks. With new stages and guns, this game brings out the real meaning of 'First Person Shooter'. Though they tweaked things that should not have been tweaked, other new features make up for it.

The controls are quite easy to master, and they have the 'adrenaline' pills, or whatever you call it. Its quite a neat feature, having 100 of these will allow you to have special features if you tap the movement keys 4 times.

So I'd recommend you get this, its just a waste if you put this back at the shelf.