Taake's Pokémon Colosseum Review

Review feedback
6 of 6 found this helpful
6 members like this
Have the comments sent to your PM!
0 thumbs!
^
Slash Apr 1, 13
I think you were to generous with the score.
The lack of wild pokemons, double battles only, and not to mention the limited amount of pokemons you could catch were all big flaws to it.
0 thumbs!
^
Lukas Apr 1, 13
quote
The lack of wild pokemons, double battles only, and not to mention the limited amount of pokemons you could catch were all big flaws to it.
How is the lack of wild Pokemon bad? How are doubles only battles bad? Not asking how that third thing is bad because yeah, limited options is kind of silly in a game series that encourages varied teams.
0 thumbs!
^
Slash Apr 1, 13
quote Lukas
How is the lack of wild Pokemon bad?
quote Lukas
limited options is kind of silly in a game series that encourages varied teams.
Not only you can only snag a small amount of pokemons they don't even give you the option to capture some wild pokemons. How is that not bad?

quote Lukas
How are doubles only battles bad?
I don't know abut you but doing 100 or so double battles gets pretty boring it'd be nice if there were some single battles to keep it varied.
0 thumbs!
^
Lukas Apr 1, 13
quote
Not only you can only snag a small amount of pokemons they don't even give you the option to capture some wild pokemons. How is that not bad?
the fact that you can snag Pokemon plus you can grind in the colosseums if needed kinda makes wild battles pointless. Would've preferred it if you had like double the Shadow Pokemon to snag so this wouldn't even be an issue haha - speaking of Shadow Pokemon, I'm surprised you don't have that problem haha

quote
I don't know abut you but doing 100 or so double battles gets pretty boring it'd be nice if there were some single battles to keep it varied.
Kind of like how in generation 2, there were only single battles - damn I wish Crystal had some double battles to keep things fresh, you know?
0 thumbs!
^
Slash Apr 2, 13
Yes because we have so much variety when snagging the pokemon.
Why would I have a problem with that? That's basically the entire core of the game.
Yes because generation 2 had double battles. And lets ignore the fact it had twice as much content to it.
0 thumbs!
^
Insanity Prevails Apr 7, 13
To be fair, it's not like Gen III really had a whole lot of doubles battles in the handheld games during the story, so for all intents and purposes you fought through hundreds of singles battles in them for every double battle you had. As much as I don't like this game, I did appreciate the focus on doubles battles after two generations of singles only battles.

The game does have problems but I never personally saw the doubles focus as one of them.



(0.1373/d/web2)