User Reviews

Average User Score:
4.78/5.0
» Submit your own review

GBA  A good game... 4.8
0 comments
by CloudStrife7709
from greeley, PA, U.S.A.
Feb 6, 2005
THE GOOD:
-Graphics
-Story-line
-Sounds
-Gameplay
-Nice Characters
-More details then NES version
-2 games in one.

THE BAD:
Difficuty kinda hard.

SUMMARY:
I have to admit, I love this game.
-Graphics 5/5
-Sounds 4.8/5
-Story-line FF1 4.5/5 FF2 5/5
-Gameplay 4.7/5
-Overall 4.8/5

This game is the bomb! It cost like $29.99, a really good for GBA. I must say this game is better than the originals.
-The graphics are great and good GBA style.
-The sounds are good.
-The story-line is better than NES version, because the NES version I don't understand.
-The gameplay good as FF6, FF5, and FF4.
-The characters graphics are way better than FF4.
-It has 2 games in 1 cartridge, amazing huh?

Buy this game than the PSX Origins (well.. if you think this is cooler than PSX version, I don't care).

8 out of 13 people found this review helpful.Did you find this review helpful? YES  NO


GBA  Final Fantasy I & II: Dawn Of Souls 4.7
0 comments
by Super Vegeta
Jan 4, 2005
THE GOOD:
You get two games for the price of one.

THE BAD:
The random battles are endless.

SUMMARY:
RPGs are a different breed of games for a different breed of gamer and FF I&II are both the titles that kicked it all off. With both games included, Dawn Of Souls is the most turned-based, stat-boosting action you can get on a GBA cart.

It's classic prophecy stuff when the world is shrouded in darkness, four warriors will appear to shed light over the land and... blah, blah, whatever. That means you'll wander around towns and dungeons, busting up monsters with spells and watching numbers go up that makes your characters stronger. Thankfully these classic FF titles are from an era when insanely complex story lines weren't the thing to be done, so characters don't babble on about destiny long enough to have formed an A button print on your right thumb from text skipping, like in most recent RPGs. But FF I&II soon make up for that in annoying random battles, enemy counters are so frequent simply getting across a field to another town is a heroic task itself, and a pain in the rear. And just incase you've never played FF, I'm not talking about the action packed paper Mario style battles. This is the old school system. It's the system were you slice the air in front of them to do damage to the enemies on the other side of the screen. You have no direct control, you just choose the actions for all four of your characters then watch it happen. The stress of constant battling is softened by an improved save mechanic, that allows you to store your progress at any point in the game, and start exactly where you left off. Remembering to do it frequently is your own concern. As well as improved graphics and sound, Square-Enix have added some special treats in both games. Completing Final Fantasy I will unlock a new dungeon called Soul Of Chaos which is packed full of bosses from the later FF series. Final Fantasy II packs an all new side quest called Soul Of Rebirth. This adventure will give you an insight into the history of the characters and it's sure to blow the mind of hardcore fans.

Overall I rate this game about 92%

7 out of 10 people found this review helpful.Did you find this review helpful? YES  NO


GBA  Double the games, double the goodness! Or crappiness...in some things. 4.8
0 comments
by firekirby
Dec 20, 2004
THE GOOD:
Wow, it's wicked in here. As you can see. 4.8 out of 5 is an A and NEARLY a Perfect A+. But it's not one to give you a letdown, you've really gotta kill for this. There are a few, but read on and you'll find them. The truly amazing details? The battle system in 2.

THE BAD:
The only failure that Square put into this game (and the NES version) is the storyline and graphics. Really, how many games do you get demanding you to "Get the Legendary Gems" or "Become the Heroes of All Life"? A hell of a lot, that's where it goes wrong. And seeing the amazing capabilities of Game Boy Advance graphics (such as Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories) it's really dissapointing.

SUMMARY:
Well, I've played a few Final Fantasy games, ranging from FF4 onwards-I've played everyone. But after this, I still wonder if this game is better than the Wonderswan Color version, and atleast better than the PSX version. Guess what? It is. It's stunning in every way. Well, ALMOST every way.

Graphics: 7/10

This is the game's killing medicine. It just can't stand up here, and it's a so...un-elite sort of way. Not even a SINGLE frame-by-frame animation.

Storyline: 8/10

It's just...old. So many games....Zelda: Get the gems...FFX: Get the Aeons (but it's a bit deeper)...Too many. But the storyline is fresh for the days it was out and not much is better!

Gameplay: 10/10 (Yay! Shiny star!)

Yay! The gameplay is simple, basic and just real nice! It's not as complicated or more complicated than it should be: Navigating dungeons, leveling up, turn-based battles, stat leveling. Theres a few side-quests, like Soul of Chaos (fight four fiends again) and Soul of Rebirth (play as dead characters). But theres some..and even meeting the mighty..the one..BAHAMUT..will help you on your quest.

Overall, not a bad game. In fact, awesome!

7 out of 12 people found this review helpful.Did you find this review helpful? YES  NO


GBA  You can buy it ...but... 4.6
0 comments
by SepheroT
from 2d floor of hot, , damn Hell
Dec 2, 2004
As many may already know, these two games were the first in a series that would soon become one of the larger game franchises in the world. What most people don't know is that this is one of the MANY times that these two games have been re-released/remade.

Let's begin with a little introduction. Final Fantasy 1 and Final Fantasy 2 are NES games that were re-released at the same time on NES a few years after their initial release dates. As a result, people got to play two good RPG games in one cartridge. Later on, it was re-released on the Wonderswan color, with new graphics (quite similar to the ones in all subsequent releases). Then came a PSX release with Final Fantasy Origins, and now Dawn of Souls.

Let's get on with the review of this game pack (I won't double-review a game, it's not worth the time to review both games separately since many key aspects are the same)

Gameplay
10/10
There is no contest, both games have excellent gameplay. With most, if not all, of the WonderSwan modifications and a few PSX bonuses. This game's gameplay has been enhanced greatly from the NES gameplay, with a precious dash function in towns, dungeons and all non-main-map areas and an auto-target system in battle. It is no contest that the addition of MP in Final Fantasy 1 also makes things a little easier, but even at that it is still a nice addition, with the Magic levels being retained in that game. The magic-learn system of Final Fantasy 2 also has it's own strong points with it's magic level-up system.

Story
10/10
Now I'm taking the storyline review down to the old NES level, back when these types of games were commonplace yet not corny yet. The stories of both games became the mold for many FF games to come, and it's no surprise. With the pure heroism of FF1 and the massive amount of plot twists in FF2, these two games have stories almost a decade before their time.

Graphics
6/10
This is where the game takes an awful hit. The graphics in the game are way too outdated for the GBA standard. For two games that were re-drawn and re-sprited in the WonderSwan Color age, it should have evolved ever since that time. Even a few changes in the colors or new looks would have been a bit nicer. Although there are very old graphics on the GBA, the looks are well polished and the double-port of the graphics didn't take that much of a hit.

Music/SFX
8/10
Yet again, rewritten music taken from the WonderSwan Color age, remixed a bit. Though the GBA can't handle good sound, at least better melee sound effects would have been nice. All in all, the game still has a lot of quality when both sounds are blended. I still feel jolted when I enter battle after a long time of not having seen one, so at least the battle music still alarms you as before.

Play Time / Replayability
12-24 hours each game.
Replay nearly infinite for both games.
While it is true that the games remain the same every time through, it's quite impossible to figure out how many possible combinations you can make with characters and spells in FF1, and it's an even larger amount of possibilities with the freestyle level-system of FF2. Changing one thing could possibly mean ultimately changing anything from how hard the game is to how far ahead you should think of your moves while walking in dungeons.

Buy or Rent?
Buy if you like old FF games. Buy if you NEED to complete your FF collection, rent if you want to try it, avoid if you already have Final Fantasy Origins and a fully functional PSX or PS2.

Recap

Gameplay - 10/10
Story - 10/10
Graphics - 6/10
Music/SFX - 8/10
Play Time / Replayability - 12-24 hours; infinite replay
Buy or Rent? - Up for debate

Final Score (not an average, although it seems like it)
8/10

6 out of 12 people found this review helpful.Did you find this review helpful? YES  NO


GBA  Final Fantasy I & II: Dawn of Souls 5.0
0 comments
by Bombite
Nov 14, 2004
THE GOOD:
I like the fact that the graphics are more developed compared to the NES, WSC, and PSX versions of these two.
The UK translation even seems to be more appropriate than the Australian/American translation of these two. It is not too literal, if you compare the Fan translations and a bit of the Australian/American translation, even though it was more or less the same at some points. Ahh, love British grammatics...
Also, they fixed some bugs that the American/Australian version had, the most annoying one being the cursor sound when checking the Magic menu in battle in Final Fantasy II.
I also like the fact that you can save anywhere you want (except for battle scenes and cut scenes).
The sound, in my humble opinion, has improved alot compared to the NES, WSC, and PSX versions of these two also.
The UK translation.

THE BAD:
The intro of FF1 has been shortened and the chase in the intro of FF2 has been removed and just started off with a battle this time, AKA NES FF2.
The bland American translation.

SUMMARY:
Final Fantasy:
Splendid. I liked the way how the gameplay was adapted to the GBA, and certainly how the music sounded so good. The harp in Boss Battle A was done very well for a handheld. I liked the fact that I could fight bosses from Final Fantasy III, especially because I've never seen or played the WSC version of Final Fantasy III. Thank God they're re-releasing it for the DS. Chaos still is the myth, the legend, and still that mad rock-'n-roll demon.
Final Fantasy II:
Loved this. The gameplay has been improved, enabling a bigger menu in the battle scenes for the items, unlike all the other versions. The face portraits look wonderful unlike the NES, WSC, and PSX versions of them, of which were limited and not as pretty most of the time. The music, in my humble opinion, is the best of all the series. I also liked Soul of Rebirth, though. It shows some new graphics that haven't been in the original Final Fantasy II, and otherwise it were recoloured graphics from the original. I liked the emperor at that point even more than the original.
Just wonderful.
Final Judgement:
I just love these two. That's all there's left to say.

8 out of 13 people found this review helpful.Did you find this review helpful? YES  NO


Lowest Prices



Series
PS3XBOX360WiiPCPS2DSPSPGBAGC
Final Fantasy Series [76]
(0.3982/d/ascension)