Related Articles

Despite the fact that these two boards use different chipsets the results of these fairly synthetic benchmarks show little difference in performance.

Because these benchmarks use actual programs like Netscape and Soundforge, this is the type of performance that you could expect to see in every day use.

Interestingly enough, the AV32 pulls ahead of the 3SPA3 in this “real-world” benchmark. The difference between the two hovers around 10% in each of the tests – not too shabby. Keep in mind that the AV32 has a slight advantage considering the fact that it’s using the more advanced chipset.

Quake3
640x480@16bit

Shuttle AV32: 121fps
EPoX 3SPA3: 120.7fps

Conclusion

With only a few manufacturers ready to ship boards using the Apollo Pro266 chipset, it will probably take at least another couple of weeks before Apollo Pro266 mobos will appear in quantity. If you’re dead set on buying a board based on this chipset, you’ll probably have to take what you can get.

As for the AV32, this board best suites individuals who already own PC100 or PC133 RAM otherwise having two types of DIMM slots is more of a liability rather than an asset. The performance of this board is a bit better than the EPoX 3SPA3, but keep in mind that board uses the older Intel i815 chipset.

The most notable drawback to this board is its below average stability, but this is almost to be expected since it is one of the first Pro266 boards available. The major plus on this board is the support for both DDR and SDR SDRAM which is an excellent way for upgraders to save money.

If you are in the market to buy a new Socket 370 motherboard, the AV32 may be what you are looking for. This motherboard does have a few weak areas, but overall it is a decent solution.

Bottom Line

Overall Score: 75%