The Neptune undoubtedly offers a great deal of performance -- but enough to warrant the price? We benched the Neptune against are regular video card benchmarking rig, in two configurations: 'default' and 'overclocked.'
For the default settings, we didn't change a single thing in the BIOS -- we just used, yes, you guessed it, the default settings. For the overclocked settings, we pushed our a X9650 a fair amount -- but not dangerously so. We used stock voltages for the CPU, as does the Neptune.
Here's the 'default' configuration:
- CPU: Intel QX9650 at 3.0 GHZ (333x9)
- Motherboard: Asus P5Q Deluxe
- Video card: Palit Radeon HD4870X2
- Memory: 2 gigabytes of Mushkin XP2-9200 DDR2 RAM (2 * 1024MB @ 800 MHz[5-5-5-18])
- Power Supply: Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W
- Hard Drive: 250 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 SATA, w/16 MB cache
- CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U 12
- OS: Vista-32,SP1
And here is the 'overclocked' configuration:
- CPU: Intel QX9650 at 3.6 GHZ (450x8)
- Motherboard: Asus P5Q Deluxe
- Video card: Palit Radeon HD4870X2
- Memory: 2 gigabytes of Mushkin XP2-9200 DDR2 RAM (2 * 1024MB @ 1128 MHz[5-5-4-12])
- Power Supply: Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W
- Hard Drive: 250 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 SATA, w/16 MB cache
- CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U 12
- OS: Vista-32,SP1
As you can see, our RAM in particular gained a significant amount of performance going from the default to overclocked configuration.