News Headlines
- Wed, May 22
- Crytek's gladiator epic Ryse confirmed as an Xbox One exclusive, more information at E3
- Tue, May 21
- Microsoft's Next-Generation Xbox Reveal: Liveblog and Discussion
- Xbox One officially announced, here are the facts
- EA teasing a new Need for Speed with image of a police supercar
- Check out the Call of Duty: Ghosts reveal trailer and Infinity Ward's behind-the-scenes tech video
New Articles
Related Articles
World in Conflict
I had to go back to the original data to call the winners here, the chart was not clear enough!
At stock, the Phenom II X4 810 was approximately 7% slower at high resolution; when overclocked, 6% slower at high resolution.
Crysis
As you can see from the chart, at Crysis, the differences were much smaller.
At stock, the Phenom II X4 810 was 1% slower than the Q8200 at high resolution.
When overclocked, at low res, the Phenom was only 0.6% slower than the Q8200 at high resolution.
Basically no difference at higher resolution, as the difference is smaller than the experimental error.
For that matter, why not underclock and disable even more useful, desirable traits of the CPU.