Neoseeker : Articles : Memory : DDR3 : OCZ vs Corsair: OCZ PC3-10666 Platinum Dual Channel Review
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

News Headlines
New Articles
Compare Prices

Motherboards
Abit
ASUS
Gigabyte
MSI
DFI
Intel
Tyan
More...

Processors
AMD
Intel
More...

Memory
DDR
DDR2
SDRAM
More...

Video Cards
ATI
eVGA
XFX
Sapphire
More...

search for lowest prices

send article   hardware newsletter   article comments (1)
OCZ vs Corsair: OCZ PC3-10666 Platinum Dual Channel Review - PAGE 4
William Henning - Monday, July 16th, 2007


RightMark Read

Unlike Sandra, RightMark Read is a more accurate measure of raw potential memory read bandwidth, and it really shows here.

At stock speeds, the OCZ PC3-10666 Platinum Dual Channel kit beats the Corsair PC3-10666, however both are badly beaten by the Corsair PC2-8888 low latency DDR2 memory at stock speeds - although most of the difference can be attributed to the 1600MHz FSB vs. 1333MHz FSB in favor of the DDR2 memory.

When overclocked, the Corsair PC3-10666 beats the overclocked OCZ PC3-10666 - but both lose badly to the overclocked DDR2 PC2-8888

RightMark Write

It is interesting to see how the story changed for write bandwidth.

At stock speeds, the OCZ and Corsair PC3-10666 memories were neck and neck, regardless of the latency differences; and when overclocked, they were still neck and neck, and dominated the chart, badly beating on the Corsair PC2-8888 results.

 

 


Article Index

1.Introduction
2.Test Setup & Benchmarks Used
3.Sandra 2007
4.RightMark Read & Write
5.RightMark Latency & Bandwidth
6.WinRAR & Doom 3
7.Overclocking & Conclusion

Submit our article to: diggDigg this! de.le.ciousdel.icio.us

Get updates when we publish new articles
Email Address:

(0.0436/d/aeon)