News Headlines
- Thu, Aug 18
- NVIDIA reveals new GTX 1060 3GB model for $200, taking on the RX 480 4GB
- Capcom to show Monster Hunter Stories and Resident Evil 7 at Tokyo Game Show next month
- Resident Evil 7 biohazard gets gameplay trailer at Gamescom, demo available now
- Wed, Aug 17
- Square Enix confirms NieR: Automata due out on Steam in early 2017
- For Honor collector's edition announced, surprise your loved one with helmets
New Articles
Related Articles
Where does the upper mid-range class of graphics card currently lie?
For the most part, most of the current generation of upper mid-range cards (HD 2600 XTs, 8600 GTS's) that we have tested have been underwhelming -- many good cards, but none that really shined. Even the speediest of the upper mid-range video cards we've tested, such as the BFG 8600 GTS OC2, have been hard to recommend over other GPU's that offer either a lot more power for a little more cash, or a little less power for a lot less cash. The gap between the upper-mid-range, and the lower-high-end, has been so wide that you could argue that there isn't a upper-mid-range -- there's just the mid-range.
And some would say the upper mid-range begins with 320 MB 8800 GTS.
But maybe -- just maybe -- today's card might change this situation. At least, that's what MSI appears to be trying to do with their latest offering, the RX2600XT Diamond Plus.
This super-charged HD 2600 XT GPU features a out-of-the-box overclocked core, but what really sets it apart from the crowd is 512MB's of GDDR4 RAM. Could the RX2600XT Diamond Plus redefine the upper-mid-range? We're going to find out.
What the RX2600XT does not have going for it, however, is the major stigmata that all the current mid-range cards carry: the dreaded, 128-bit memory interface, which limits video memory thorough-put. Will that negate the advantages of the quicker GDDR?
Will the RX2600XT Diamond Plus have what it takes to compete for your consumer dollar in the face of the attractively priced high-end DX9 cards (such as the X1950 Pro), and be able to at least compare in performance to the strong graphic-goodness power offered by the 320 MB 8800 GTS video cards?
Benchmarks will help us find out.
But first, let's take a get to know the RX2600XT a little better...
Article Index |
|
Just thought id say, While the review was accurate at the time. Most of the performance issues from ATI/AMD Were driver related.
Ive owned both the Diamond and Diamond+, im currently using the Original Diamond on my Development Machine Temporarily and it easily keeps up with my EVGA 8800GTS320(G80){Science Box} at low resolutions(5-10fps lower average).
Its not a mid-range card by today's standards, but its still faster than nearly any low-end card still on the market today. But at a much better price-point.
out of Curiosity, i did benchmarks with the same games and applications you did in 2007. But this time running the 12.1 Catalyst Drivers. I wagered 46.2% average increase in FPS on high, through out all of those games...
I only wish i would of spent the extra $27/USD at the time to get the Diamond+ instead, as right now i would be better off.
------
On a side note, the Diamond FAR outperformed my own BFG Geforce 8600GTS i have. I recycled it recently because its performance wasnt any near comparable.