News Headlines
- Fri, May 24
- Time and Eternity Preview: All the Single Ladies
- Joe Danger 1 and 2 set to crash onto Steam later this year, Big Picture and Workshop support included
- Sony explains why Gran Turismo 6 is staying on PS3, cites PS3 potential and install base
- Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD is comign to iOS on May 30, prepare your Apple devices
- PlayStation 4 could reach Europe within 2013, according to UK newspaper ad
New Articles
Related Articles
Operating Temperatures

We used the program OCCT to measure 'load' temperatures once 200 seconds elapsed.
Vapor chamber or no, the HD 5970 puts out a lot of heat when things are really pushed to the edge. Don't expect it to reach such toasty in normal operation though -- for the time being, not many games strain the video card too much.
Nonetheless, 'non-reference cooler' comes to mind when looking at these results.
Power Usage

We used a Kill-o-Watt measuring device in conjunction with the program OCCT to measure 'load' temperatures once 200 seconds elapsed.
The load power usage seems reasonably (high) for the performance of the video card. Even at 40nm a great deal of power is needed to keep those billions of transistors firing on all cylinders.
In our chats with AMD, they made much out of the extremely low idle power state. In our testing, we just didn't see it. Don't get us wrong -- the idle is great, but it is not ground-breakingly low; just compare it to the GTX 295 above.
With the HD 5970, you can either connect two 6 pin PCIE power connectors, or one 6 pin and one 8 pin PCIE connector. If you want to overclock, you'll need the 8 pin PCIE connected.
Once again, with all powerful gaming cards such as this, you'll want the right PSU for the job. A well made 650W PSU or above is recommended here. If you run it on much less you might be pushing things.
Conclusion
Like the HD 5870, the HD 5970 is in the enviable position of not having much competition. That being said though, we thought the GTX 295 held up pretty well against it; certainly the HD 5970 is the new king of the block, but the GTX 295 is able to keep up -- this is could arguably be the better state of the SLI drivers as opposed to the Catalyst CrossFire drivers, which typically take longer to mature.
For the lucky ones who may have a monster video card lying under their Christmas tree this year, if you want top-of-the-line, top-tier performance than the strongest option is the HD 5890. While the GTX 295 still holds up in the benchmarks, as we recommended in our recent HD 5870 reviews, we feel that it is best to stick with ATI for the moment because of DirectX 11 (which promises to really materialize into something, unlike DX10) and Eyefinity is nice feature to have as well.
Let's talk about prices for a bit. As a typical high-end monster-card introductory price, the HD 5970 sells for $600 USD. This is steep, but a fair price for the state of video card right now. Almost all HD 5000 series cards, and most Nvidia high-end cards (GTX 260 and above), are in short supply. So don't expect prices to fall any time soon. Some previous dual-GPU monster cards entered the market at a time when you could buy the equivalent pair of video cards and do your own multi-GPU setup (i.e buying a pair of HD 3870s when the HD 3870 X2 came out) but this isn't the case here. We expect HD 5000 prices to remain stable -- even possibly for a month or two after the launch of Nvidia's new generation, which is rumored not be coming in big volumes until the end of January. $600 may seem high but this is a fair price as far as supply and demand dictates.
We felt that perhaps the HD 5970 was a touch on the underclocked side. Unfortunately our guess would be that many users out there (none of us of course) will not investigate the overclocking ability of this video card, so, for those people, they'll have a HD 5970 that is only running at %80-%85 of it's safe potential clock speeds. If you get this card, you must, must overclock it. It is underclocked out of the box (to benefit power consumption). No need to push it to the limit like we did in our O/C testing, but at least add 15% to the clocks to get yourself playing games in top-gear.
On the other hand of the overclocking coin, the HD 5970 is such a powerful card offering such great performance that there isn't all that much that will really strain the video card, in the way of games, out just yet regardless. But rest assured 2010's crop of games will no doubt be taxing this video card well before Blizzard puts out there next game.
If you want top-end, no-joke performance right now, then there is only one option really: the HD 5970.
- Comment on this article (26)
- check out our other Game Accelerator Cards articles
- read more ATI Radeon HD 5970 reviews
- visit our Game Accelerator Cards section
Article Index
|
|

next
1 2
And if the PhysX in the game isn't being accelerated, then what the crap is this "stream processing" doing?
AMD and Nvidia will continue battling for the top graphics card until one of them either stops making them or, and this part is from me, until it is no longer necessary to make gpu's more powerful as there's probably more potential power to be used than there is actual use. Like with the holodecks then holograms that are being developed, after those are out and can take any game imaginable at 100% realistic graphics there's really nowhere to go except for more power efficiency.
What I want to know now is wtf will sci fi books write about in the future? Other than jedi mind control we're eventually going to hit a brick wall.
As for the physx support they dont support it per card like nvidia has a dedicated card, at least that's what it sounds like. But you can still run it.
And also this when I asked for clarificaton:
Seems ATI has some kind of equivalent to PhysX processing, but I have no idea if it really improves performance in any way compared to simply running PhysX on the CPU.
Any ideas what they meant?
You can run games with physx and have it enabled on ati cards but it will seriously slow the card down. At least that was the case in cryostasis, but that games main selling point other than the ambiance was the amount of physx used in the game.
Ati does have a bit of driver issues but you usually never have to roll them back like you have to do with nvidia's drivers if something goes wrong.
But when I tried to get some info out of them about their GF100 cards, they didn't even reply to say no they couldn't tell me anything.
ATI at least replied and told me some confusing jargon when I asked if their cards had any kind of PhysX support or equivalent. I had no idea what they were on about, but they replied!
Various issues include BSODs, flickering texture surfaces in games like Oblivion, strange... lagging light trails in games like X3 Reunion (engine trails leave a ghost image)...
Weird lines on the screen unless you turn off the second processing core...
Bloody hell. >_<
Why does ATI suck so much at drivers?
but you could always wait for a few more months, and im sure the price will drop significantly. it is only that expensive because its the best ATI has to offer.
Then I saw the price. Yeah, I don't think so. For that price they should personally customise my case to actually fit the damn card, and put my hard drives into drive bay caddies for me, as there's no way to leave those where they are right now and fit this monster.
What on earth were they thinking making it so long?
I COULD probably in theory manage to use this, but it would require the removal of my hard drive cage and the installation of three drive bay caddies.
I hope the Nvidia offering is SMALLER. My 8800GTX barely fits as it is.
The REAL question is....Will it be worth the extra cash? ATI cards will be cheaper to be sure.
I think if you put it in a folding farm you could fill up the pci-e x16 slots but not crossfire them and have it work. At least that's what ive seen some pics with nvidia cards doing. not sure if ati will work that way.
next
1 2