News Headlines
- Tue, Jun 18
- EA's Frostbite 3 optimizations not exclusive to AMD after all, collaborating on day-one support for Battlefield 4
- First official look at The Sims 4 confirmed for gamescom, taking the stage August 21
- League of Legends Interview: How Riot is shaping the community with less bans, and more rewards
- The Division E3 2013 Impressions: Best bullet holes in glass technology in years
- What's different in New Super Luigi U? Luigi is green, also plenty else as shown in latest trailer
New Articles
Related Articles
Interesting results: fairly good showing in the Vertex and Fill Rate tests.



![]()

next: Unreal Tournament 3 »
|
|

I love this card at first sight. Gigabyte done very good job
Jeff17 -=> This is the only HD3870 with DDR3 as far as I know.
Also, the Powercolor HD3850 Xtreme PCS that was used in the benchmarks is a factory-overclocked, super-charged HD3850 that uses DDR4 memory. So, it is sort of a reverse match-up of what you might normally see... it is a bit surprising how close the two came in the benchmarks. The low memory clock of the Gigabyte 3870 definitely does not help the cards performance -- but this can be overcome by a reasonable overclock.
Here's an old post about the differences between GDDR3 and GDDR4 (stolen from a forum):
GDDR3 vs GDDR4
1) 7.2 vs 11.2 GBps per chip max data speed
2) 1.8 vs 2.8 GBps per pin max data rate
3) 1.8 vs 1.5 v minimum power consumption which results in a 20-25% energy savings
4) 2.1 vs 1.9 v maximum power for overclocking
5) 4 vs 8 bit burst length which allows more memory bandwidth and lower latency
6) no DBI vs DBI: Data Bus Inversion - it takes more energy to transfer 0s than 1s. When there are a lot of 0s to move, it will send them as 1s instead and then use DBI to signal that all those 1s needed to be flipped back to 0s. This is a power saving feature.
7) Three point voltage control via video card driver for fine tuning and overclocking
I haven't specifically tested for speed differences between GDDR3 and GDDR4 (hey not a bad idea for an article hmm..) but I can tell you, that it makes a significant difference, but not a HUGE difference. As in, the difference isn't big enough to make or break a card; it is only a small performance difference; but it is there.
BTW we are missing pictures throughout my last two video card reviews.
It seems that we are being hot-linked a lot more now, and that is somehow getting our pictures taken off the articles due to cache issues. Developer guys here at home base are checking it out and will be fixing the problem soon, most certainly.
I'm a bit confused. The review said the Gigabyte 3870 card was quiet. It's anything but unfortunately. The fan stays on 100% all the time. This would have been a great card if the fan was temperature controlled.
I'll be testing it tomorrow, so I'll investigate further and get back to you.
Worse case though, you could run a manual fan control program (such as riva tuner) and keep the fan running at %60 or %70 and you should be fine.
Oh and just btw, just checked out the card's price on newegg, and the first user review that popped up says the fan runs "nearly silent" so that also lends me to believe yours is misfiring somehow.
And you do have the HD3870 as pictured in my review right? Just wanted to check because there are multiple models of the Gigabyte HD3870.
i dont want to connect it to an external low volt source or use speed controller like Fan mate ?
thnx
Personally I haven't been using Cat 8.10; but that's what I've been reading.