News Headlines
- Tue, Aug 09
- Pokémon GO 1.3.0 update rolls out field test for new tracking system, battery saver returns to iOS
- Super Mario 3D Land gets New 3DS bundle as new titles join Nintendo Selects collection
- Persona 5 will capture Europe's heart in 2017 on Valentine's Day, collector's editions announced
- Mon, Aug 08
- Indie adventure The Girl and the Robot escapes on August 18
- Bethesda is talking to Nintendo, considering game development for NX
New Articles
Related Articles

Introduction
Today we're looking at one of Epox's KT400 boards, which we received with much anticipation. The source of this anticipation was an Epox announcement stating this board allows the enduser to change the clock multiplier through BIOS without unlocking your Athlon chip! Initially we took this at face value, but we later revised our opinion after being given some critical feedback. Read ahead to see exactly what we found.
![]() |
Last week, we reviewed the FIC's AN19E, another KT400 board that earned top marks because of the very ability that caught our attention when we heard of the 8K9A2+: multiplier overclocking. As you may recall from our previous review, the AN19E and Epox's 8K9A have nearly identical layouts. Looking again at the comparison below, you can almost literally superimpose the images of the two boards and not tell one apart from the other. The only difference between the layouts is in the LED diagnostic display on the Epox board.
![]() |
| Am I seeing double? |
The reason for this similarity isn't as sinister as it may seem; Epox and FIC collaborated in engineering this board design, and so the two share similarities in features and layout. Later you will see that the FIC and Epox boards do NOT have the same performance results and overclocking tolerance. The Epox also makes this board stand out thanks to some extras like the included rounded IDE and floppy cables.
![]() |
| Epox 8K9A2+ Box Contents |
Article Index
|
|




EPoX 8K9A2+
T-bird 1.4(8.5x203) 1725mhz
goliath heatsink
corsair xms 512 cl2
gainward geforce 2 mx400
ibm 60gxp 20gb x2
raid 0
pacific digital 24x12x40
52x cd-rom
hitachi 21 monitor
digi-doc 5
Q4 full tower case modded
raidmax 500w
Drive corruptions without the 1/6 divider are a common problem, and I'm sort of skeptical that looser memory timings would solve anything since you're running your PCI at such high speeds (which is the likely source of the corruption), but different PIO settings might do something.
Hey how do you like your Goliath for cooling at such high speeds? And what voltage are you using to get your chip stable?
-Gxcad
This message was edited by Gxcad on Dec 13 2002.
Most of our recent reviews are of this higher quality. We have a better test lab setup, a more standardized results collection methodology, and we're working on better presentation. So far it's increased the output and the quality of results by quite a bit, and our conclusions are likewise improved. You can thank Deviate for his thoroughness of benchmarking as a part of the equation, and Entity and I have been working on the new graph style and organization. Other Neoseeker regulars may have also noticed that we're doing a slightly different presentation of images, so that BIOS pics, in particular, give a much clearer idea of features even before being clicked and enlarged. <g>
Jamey:
Sounds like that Goliath is really cooling that chip nicely. I can't believe you have such low temp scores when oc'ing so much. But with those fans, I'm thinking it might drive me nuts with noise, since I keep my system on all night. I'm actually really eager to get some speed controllable fans for my case, so that I can turn them down at night when the CPU is mostly idling.
This message was edited by Redemption on Dec 13 2002.
I'll explain further in our update and corrections to the article, which will take place when I finish my investigation.
Thanks,
Justin
"Who said 15yr olds can't be overclockers;)"