Author: Anthony Roberts
Editor: Howard Ha
Publish Date: Thursday, September 7th, 2000
Originally Published on Neoseeker (http://www.neoseeker.com)
Article Link: http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/casio_wmp1v/
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. - please do not redistribute or use for commercial purposes.
Introduction
| The WMP-1V in the Box |
Don’t make any mistake; Casio went to great lengths when designing this gadget. It’s chock full of features that are baffling considering the packing and the weight of the final product. The player weighs around 70g(less than 2 ounces), and once strapped on feels no heavier than a standard watch. If it weren’t for its sheer size, I would wager that you wouldn’t even notice the added bulk of the electronics, memory, and battery that must be housed in this gadget.
| All the components in the kit |
The buttons on the player take a little getting used to. They’re small, rubbery, and not the most responsive buttons on the planet. I had little enough problem getting them to do what I want, and found them to be reliable and fit for their job, but everyone I asked thought the buttons were not very user friendly. I had no problems with them though, and was happy to find that the fast-forward and rewind buttons also allow you to scan through songs. I was less impressed with the mode button, which you will have to play with A LOT to do certain things. The player allows you to switch between play modes – a total of 4 including the standard shuffle and repeat modes, along with an A-B repeat mode that Casio calls “Part Repeat”. The problem is that to get to the EQ settings of the player, you’re stuck with having to press through all the play modes before finally reaching the EQ settings. That’s not the most convenient setup, but I guess the limited number of buttons restricts the possibilities.
Display & Transfer
| Watch on the wrist |
The LCD display of the unit is pitifully small, but I doubt they could have mustered any more screen real estate out of the watch, which was already big enough. The screen is “backlit” by a small orangish light from out of one corner. In MP3 mode the watch displays the track number, elapsed time, and play mode (shuffle, repeat, etc). The bottom half of the window can display little animated icons during playback of music, or it can display the track title. The animated icons are mediocre at best, and I couldn’t even tell half the time what they were supposed to be. Casio even went to the trouble of including a software utility that lets you design and animate your own little icons, which can then be uploaded to the player. I wondered whether such a utility would ever see any use. The track title that is “displayed” by the LCD is painfully done so letter by letter. That’s right… it actually flashes each letter in sequence and its up to you to decipher what the heck is going on. I’m not sure who decided it would be cool to flash the titles like that, but it certainly turned out to be a pain, and it was apparent that no one would get any use out of this display feature. That’s a lot of screen space wasted, and I couldn’t help but wonder if they could have at least scrolled the title across that lower half, maybe 5 or so characters at a time. It just seems weird to try and force so much screen information in so small a space.
| USB Transfer & Charge Cradle |
| Watch connected to the cradle |
Battery Life & Storage
| Watch spread out with earbuds |
As if the short play time weren’t enough of a negative, I was also amazed that the watch needed nearly 4 hours in order to fully charge the built-in battery – this was ridiculously high compared to other rechargeable batteries that can typically be fully charged in 1-2 hours time. Because of the combination of low battery life and long recharge times, I was wondering whether the watch would serve a very limited purpose. I am a stickler when it comes to charging things. My cell phone has a 12 day standby and I always find myself out of batteries when I need it most. So I think I would be very hard put to keep up with the “maintenance” demands of this player.
| Closeup of face & earbuds |
In spite of all these quirks, I was eager to test out the actual music quality of the player, and I wasn’t disappointed at all by what I heard. The sound that came from this clunky wannabe watch is clear, vibrant and possibly better than a good handful of similar products. The sound was surprisingly clean, in spite of the low 70dB minimum Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) listed in the manual’s specs. I was pleasantly treated to mild, but passable bass, and a pretty detailed upper end. There was no doubt to me that the watch would satisfy the casual listeners, and would carve itself out a place amongst the sporty types who might pick this gadget over their tape or CD players. It certainly is easier to go jogging with the WMP-1V strapped to a wrist, rather than having a larger player bouncing in a pocket or threatening to pop off your shorts regardless of belt clips and straps. I wouldn’t bet on impressing chicks with this thing though, and you’re better off realizing straight off the bat that other, more sophisticated players out there will likely win you more attention and fame.
Audio Quality & Final Thoughts
The earbuds that come with the Casio don’t look very exciting, but their audio output quality belied the plain looking design. When I took the earbuds and tested them separate from the player, I was treated to relatively detailed music with passable bass reproduction. When pushed, the earbuds really took well to added bass, and managed to keep a smooth and deep response to most material. My test player could crank out more bass than the Casio, so I knew the earbuds certainly had good potential. Some instruments didn’t sound quite right, and the earbuds didn’t have a completely transparent and clear soundstage – I’ve heard some earbuds with amazing stereo separation, and while these earbuds had good upper frequency reproduction, they lacked that extra crispness and detail that I have heard in the past. Overall though, these are some of the better sounding “stock” earbuds that I’ve come across, and paired with the Casio Wrist Audio player, the sound was very satisfactory, with a nice baselines, nice highs, and good vocal reproduction.
| Watch & buds just chillin' |
All the quirks aside, the watch is an interesting step in the right direction. As technology improves, I imagine that future iterations of the Audio Wrist Watch will become increasingly appealing to a crowd of tech savvy consumers. Right now, I think the watch is more of a tech bauble - a toy if you will. And at a suggested retail price of $249US, I think it costs a little too much for what you get. Certainly the full size players we’ve seen in the past few weeks are a more appropriate investment for portable digital music. Although if you are an avid jogger or bicyclist, I can imagine that the watch’s combination of good audio quality and rugged portability could be a great boon. In the end, this is a very specialized product, and its price, limited storage capacity, and short battery life are all very strong considerations that would suggest you look elsewhere.
Overall Score: 75%
Please do not redistribute or use this article in whole, or in part, for commercial purposes.