Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

News Headlines
New Articles
Compare Prices

Motherboards
Abit
ASUS
Gigabyte
MSI
DFI
Intel
Tyan
More...

Processors
AMD
Intel
More...

Memory
DDR
DDR2
SDRAM
More...

Video Cards
ATI
eVGA
XFX
Sapphire
More...

search for lowest prices

send article   hardware newsletter   article comments (1)
ATI RADEON X1000 Series - PAGE 10
Geordan Hankinson, Terren Tong
- Wednesday, October 5th, 2005


Both the Call of Duty 2 and F.E.A.R. tests were taken from their respective demo's as retail copy's of either are not yet available.

We used maximum settings for Call of Duty 2, with Vsync disabled.

The X1800XT is noticeably faster than the pack at running Cod2, but it get's a little tighter in the middle of the pack, with the X1800 XL losing to the 7800 GT by a hair with filtering and high resolution set.

For testing F.E.A.R., we set everything at maximum, with the exception of sound quality, which was set to low. We also decided upon disabling soft shadows and setting the shadow quality to medium as both incur a large performance hit which hurts the usefulness of the results.

The FEAR benchmark ended up causing no end of trouble for us, and the results still ended up all over the place. We're not sure what caused the skewed results, but we're guessing that driver optimizations from both sides have not quite been perfected yet. This might make sense seeing as the only cards not running on Beta drivers were the X850 XT and X800 XL, and both manage very strong scores, with the X850 beating all of the other cards by a wide margin with filtering on.


Article Index

1.Introduction
2.Physical Views
3.Architecture - Fill Rate, Process Tech, Rendering
4.Pipeline continued, Ring Bus, Arbiter
5.Image Quality
6.Avivo
7.Test Setup and Hardware
8.3D Mark 2005 and Halo
9.Half Life 2 and Doom 3
10.Call of Duty 2 and F.E.A.R.
11.Far Cry and Splinter Cell: CT
12.Conclusion

Submit our article to: diggDigg this! de.le.ciousdel.icio.us

Get updates when we publish new articles
Email Address:

(0.0190/d/nova)