Follow @neoseeker
News Headlines
- Wed, Jun 19
- The War Z becomes Infestation: Survivor Stories citing trademark conflicts, game otherwise unaffected
- Microsoft's One Mistake: Pressing reset on the Xbox One's aspirations of a digital future
- Surprise! Company of Heroes 2 beta extended through June 23
- Microsoft officially canceling Xbox One online and used game policies across the board
- Nintendo wins appeal over Wii Fit Balance Board patent litigation, probably not over
New Articles
Related Articles
The demo of these two gaming benchmarks can be downloaded for free. Call of Juarez is made by Ubisoft whereas the World in Conflict game is developed by Massive Entertainment. They will be run at the lowest settings possible so the score is not GPU-bound, so that implies a resolution of 1024x768 for Call of Juarez and 800x600 for World in Conflict. This way, the true processor power will be exhibited.
In Call of Juarez, all processors were comparable, except the G6950 which scored way lower than all the others. The Core i3 and Core i5 seemed to be a bit better though. World in Conflict put all three Intel processors at the top, except the Phenom II X4 910e which could infiltrate them once overclocked.
next: Crysis Warhead & Bioshock »
Article Index |
|
Comments
sydtron Jan 26, 10
Why did you have to disable Cool'N'Quiet to OC the 910e? I am looking into this processor and procedure, but want that good idle power consumption!