News Headlines
- Mon, May 20
- Forzavista trademarked ahead of tomorrow's Xbox event, likely a feature of Forza 5
- Splinter Cell: Blacklist video introduces co-op and Sam Fisher's partner, Isaac Briggs
- Rhode Island set to sell Kingdoms of Amalur assets in order to try and recover part of $130 million debt
- Watch Dogs pre-order incentives detailed, including some locked gameplay content and other perks
- Shadow Warrior announced, reimagining of 3D Realms' classic FPS from the Hard Reset developers
New Articles
Related Articles
Futuremark PCMark Vantage
PCMark is a benchmarking suite from FutureMark, who also make the renown 3DMark. It includes many tests to calculate overall system performance including hard drive performance. The hard drive suite performs tasks such as scanning for viruses, streaming, recording and more. It is a fairly good indicative of general real-world performance.

Futuremark PCMark 7
PCMark resembles a lot to the 3DMark suite from FutureMark, except the fact that it includes many other tests like hard drive speed, memory and processor power, so it is considered as a system benchmark and not just a gaming benchmark.

Just like the previous benchmark, the Pyro SE drives do not end up as the fastest in our testbed, but they are still faster than their predecessor. They also blow away the performance of the Seagate HDD we tested for comparison.
Article Index |
|
The 4K test seems it's pretty consistent across all SSDs (including my own) to the point that it seems nearly pointless to perform...Hell, my 4K write speed is listed as beating the Raid0-ed (and even the 240GB SE, sans RAID0).
What I'm really shocked on is how much write speeds have improved over the last several years. It seems pretty recently that one of the big problems with SSDs compared to HDDs is write speed, but it seems like the better SSDs on the market are beating conventional HDDs by a wide margin. My OCZ Vertex2 can't beat my 7200RPM HDD for sequential write speeds however (the read speeds are a good 30% higher though). Totally destroys the 4K write speeds though (about 50MB/s versus 1.2MB/s. Though those numbers seem very wonky to me.).
However, putting aside the obvious $/GB issue with SSDs, isn't one of the big problems with SSDs the total number of writes before they start failing? HDDs have a big advantage there, last I checked?
Not sure about operational time either. Don't HDDs have operational times in the millions of hours?