News Headlines
- Tue, Jun 18
- First official look at The Sims 4 confirmed for gamescom, taking the stage August 21
- League of Legends Interview: How Riot is shaping the community with less bans, and more rewards
- The Division E3 2013 Impressions: Best bullet holes in glass technology in years
- EA's Frostbite 3 games ship optimized for AMD, NVIDIA has to wait until after launch
- What's different in New Super Luigi U? Luigi is green, also plenty else as shown in latest trailer
New Articles
Related Articles
While the Corsair Performance Pro performs differently than a drive based on the SandForce controller, we found it more consistent across the board. An example of this can be seen in our HDTune benchmark, which tests the SSD's read and write performance. Our benchmark results showed how the Marvell-based performance Pro had less of a separation between the highs and lows, meaning there was never a time when the drive's performance substantially dropped. This is usually not the case with SandForce based drives, which tend to have high peak performance, with large downward dips at random times. So, the fact that the Performance Pro didn’t suffer from this should mean the drive delivered consistent performance at all times.
The Marvell 9174 controller was also able to go toe to toe with the SandForce-based SSDs in our test bed, pretty much across the board. The Performance Pro performed well throughout our synthetic testing as well as our load time and data transferring benchmarks. All this highlights how the Marvell controller is a real challenger to the SandForce controller.
However, the price of drives using the Marvell controller is equally as high as drives using the SandFroce design. Currently both will set you back nearly $2 per gigabyte, so neither option comes cheap. Still, the Corsair Performance Pro is an excellent SSD that offers best in class performance, and proves to be a good counter weight to a market flooded with SandForce-based drives.
The 256GB model we examined in this review currently has an MSRP of $399. While this certainly isn't the cheapest drive available, we highly recommend the Corsair Performance Pro and feel the price is justified considering the price of similar SSDs.

- Comment on this article (6)
- check out our other SATA Hard Drives articles
- read more Corsair Performance Pro reviews
- visit our SATA Hard Drives section
|
|

I'm actually pretty impressed with this. My only annoyance is that lower storage models with SSDs tend to also have lower speeds as well. I will NOT need a whopping 250GB of storage for an OS and high priority programs, I just won't >_>
Would be nice if there was a high speed 60GB to 80GB drive that had a lower price (Like I could live with $180 even. Bit under half the price with a fraction of the storage yes, but all the same speed). Ah, I can dream eh?
As far as the AS SSD goes I wonder how well it would scale with a RAID0 setup? It wouldn't match the RAID0 setup of the Pyro SE in terms of read time, but considering the overall score difference between a single Performance Pro and the Pyro SE in RAID0 is about 160 points, I'm curious as to the score it would get. Certainly it would be considerably higher overall. It's write time would get a nice boost out of it, and it's already better as it is.
But really, those access times blew the Pyro SE out of the water, in fact it's the only drive tested with access times below 1/10th of a millisecond 0_o More than that, the read and write access times being comparable is another significant thing, since SandForce controller seems to have problems with that.
Consistent AND fast indeed!
My next SSD will probably be a Marvell 9174 (or later, improved generation) controller based since its ability to deliver consistent and fast performance across the board is winning me over. Hah, two SSD reviews in two days, and I was very impressed with the results of both
60GB Force 3 = 525/490
60GB Force GT = 555/495
90GB Force GT = 555/505
120GB Force GT = 555/515
240GB Force GT = 555/525
Whereas a last gen (SF-1200) 60GB Force is 280/270