News Headlines
- Fri, May 24
- Time and Eternity Preview: All the Single Ladies
- Joe Danger 1 and 2 set to crash onto Steam later this year, Big Picture and Workshop support included
- Sony explains why Gran Turismo 6 is staying on PS3, cites PS3 potential and install base
- Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD is comign to iOS on May 30, prepare your Apple devices
- PlayStation 4 could reach Europe within 2013, according to UK newspaper ad
New Articles
Related Articles
The "Tahiti XT" GPU is designed to fit into the enthusiast market and sits above all other single GPU graphics cards currently available. AMD is also going to release the "Tahiti Pro" graphics processor at a later date, but for the time being it is still being kept behind closed doors. Later down the line, AMD is also going to be releasing "Pitcairn" (to replace the HD 6800 series) and "Cape Verde", which is the Southern Islands budget GPU.
Aesthetically, the HD 7970 is best described as a hybrid between the HD 5000 and HD 6000 series graphics cards. As you can see, the HD 7970 still sports the classic AMD red and black color scheme and uses a rear mounted blower style fan, but the shroud has a more rounded design. The new visual style is actually quite appealing in comparison to the VHS design of the HD 6000 series. Along with the improved look, the rounded design of the back-end of the shroud improves ventilation when the graphics card is used in CrossFireX. As far as the dimensions go, the HD 7970 is roughly the same size as the HD 6970, so even with the reduced die size the PCB is still 10.5-inches in length.
The "Tahti XT" core itself is built on a 28nm process with a die size of 365mm² and has roughly 4.31 billion transistors. With the smaller node, AMD was able to turn up the engine to 925MHz, while still including 2048 streaming processors, 32 ROPS and 128 texture units, giving the card a total compute power of 3.79 TFLOPs peak single precision FP and 947 GFLOPs of double precision. Additionally, the HD 7970 comes with a massive 3GB GDDR5 fame buffer clocking in at 1375MHz (5.5Gbps QDR) and running on a 384-bit memory bus. This gives the HD 6970 substantial memory bandwidth but since most games are not memory limited, the biggest impact on performance should be seen when using the graphics cards Eyefinity or HD3D technologies.
The back of the PCB is clean for a high-end graphics card, but all the solder points give away some of the card's secrets. Looking at the back of the board, we can see twelve soldering points for the memory that surround the GPU in a C-shaped pattern. Interestingly enough, the board includes solder points for two full 8-pin power connectors. We aren't entirely sure what AMD was working on there, as that would given the board a total power rating of 375W which far higher than any single GPU graphic card currently on the market.
The back also includes two CrossFireX connectors and a PCIe Generation 3.0 x16 lane. By using the PCIe 3.0 interface, the board has double the maximum data rate over Gen 2.0, giving the card up to 32 GB/s of bi-directional bandwidth on an x16 connector. It is going to be hard for a single graphics card to saturate the PCIe Gen 3 interface with so much bandwidth, so the benefit will most likely only be noticeable with scaling multiple graphics cards together in CrossFireX configuration.
Like the 6900 series, the HD 7970 comes equipped with PowerTune technology. PowerTune is basically a power management system that maximizes the performance of the board via dynamic power adjustment. It does this by increasing the GPU clock speed in real time when the GPU detects power headroom, and throttling the clocks when a certain power limit is exceeded. This allows the board to adjust the clock speeds on a microsecond level. The maximum PowerTune rating for the HD 7970 is around 220W at load, but even with a power envelope lower than the HD 6970, AMD has included a 8+6 pin power configuration for up to 300W of power. This gives the board plenty of headroom which should come in handy during overclocking, and also ensures the board is fully stable during peak power consumption.
With the 28nm node we were expecting the power consumption to be slightly lower than 220W, but even so AMD has still managed to impress us with the board's idle power features. What they have done is added a feature called "Zero Core Power Technology" that reduces the idle power consumption by up to 95%. This allows the graphics card to reduce the power down to around 3 Watts when the system is idle for long periods of time, whereas a standard idle period has a power consumption rating of 15W. At both idle and long idle, the board utilizes a GPU clock deep sleep and DRAM stuttering features, along with compressing the contents of the frame buffer. This gives the HD 7970 roughly a 45% improvement in idle power consumption in comparison to the HD 6970.
One of the most interesting features of "Zero Core Power" is seen when using CrossFireX. Traditionally, anyone using multiple GPUs in a single system had to deal with a high power idle state, simply because each card was still actively drawing system power; each graphics card could produce 30+ watts of power even when the system wasn't under load. With "Zero Core Power", the extra graphics cards in a CrossFireX system are disabled, shutting down the fans and capping any voltage from going to the core. Since PowerTune works on a microsecond level, "Zero Core Power" will not interfere with gaming as all the GPUs can become active again in microseconds.
The default video outputs on the HD 7970 are similar to the 6000 series. In total there are two Mini-DP connectors, a single HDMI 1.4a connector and a Dual-Link DVI connector. Noticeably missing however is the stacked DVI port that was first introduced with the 6800 series graphics cards. The reason behind removing the port is not due to a substantial change in the video configuration, or even the MST Hubs becoming available. Instead AMD explains that removing the second DVI port actually reduces the level of turbulence being created, thus decreasing the overall acoustic levels during operation. Each HD 7970 will also ship with an HDMI to DVI dongle, and mini-DP to DVI dongle that allow the card to support up to three DVI connections out of the box.
The two on-board Mini-DP ports use the 1.2 standard which allows them to support up to three monitors per port (via MST Hub) and also support AMD HD3D technology. The middle HDMI 1.4a connector also supports 3GHz speeds with frame packing. Essentially this allows the connection to run the frames faster, thus creating a smoother gaming experience. The HDMI and DP ports can also be paired together to support HD3D Surround which increases both the depth and field of view in games, making for a truly unique gaming experience.
Article Index |
|
The only thing I have to disagree with you on is that it's overpriced... or rather, it's not 'relatively' overpriced compared to Nvidia's GTX 580. For having an average of 25.8% higher performance in 2560x1600 (With only a single score under 18% difference) I think the $50 (10%) more you pay over the GTX 580 is worth it if you're spending that much to begin with. On a whole though both cards are overpriced.
Add on to that all the new or improved features and it's a pretty solid package imo, even though I was hoping for a bit more from the 28nm node.
ATI is trying to take advantage of its new GPU as the "fastest single-core chip" before Kepler is out. The price will be lowered afterwards plus some performance improvements through new drivers.
Was going to opt for one of the new Sapphire Dual Fan 6970s but since in a months time the 7xxx series will be out, will probably wait until these get on the market.
Only issue is that I can't fit a full 275mm GPU in my case. Ideally needs to be less than 250mm.
TBH after the failings of the FX/Bulldozer CPUs, AMD does need this to hit the market strong, since for the past years nVidia have been infront of AMD on performance. Seems AMD is starting to go for better price/performance instead of trying to compete head on with Intel.
Mind you, if the Piledrivers improve the Bulldozer architechture and fix it's issues (by having 8 true cores instead of modules), and manages to fit an AM3+ socket, then I might be tempted to go for one of them aswell.
The 6970 was only around $300 at launch, so I honestly expected this one to be around $400. AMD is not going to sell many cards with this price point, because to be honest, it's NOT worth it. A 15% increase over a 580 in most cases is awful, not only because it's 28nm, but because it's a whole new Architecture.
Overpriced, underperforming, not worth it. I'll wait for Kepler.
Also, the HD 6970 had an MSRP of closer to $400 at launch, so it was expected this card would retail higher due to the better performance.
Anyway, this should be at $400, if it were $400, it would be reasonable for sure. $350 would be the sweet spot that would really just destroy Nvidia. The thing I love about AMD/ATI's cards were the fact that they offered the best price/performance. $550 is absolutely overpriced, you can't even argue it. The GTX 580 is also overpriced, and while this does beat out the 580 for a similar price ($50 more than the 3GB 580), this is a standard reference next-gen card. It should be around the same price as their standard current gen cards, or around $50 more. It's nothing amazing in the performance department, either. If it had a solid 40%-45% increase over the GTX 580, I could see $550.
That said... I was still expecting a bit more wow factor, I'm guessing the 7990 when that comes around will do the big leap though much like the 6990 did. Maybe we can get a MARS version...
the price is high, but what do you expect? its new tech. they are always overpriced initally. sure, the initial price is high, even by those standards, but im sure if you wait a month or two, it will drop considerably. in any case, i believe that the extra price is partly justified with all the features offered, ecpecially considering that it has some better power management technology added in, as well as the improvements to eyefinity with the audio and the 3d features. i myself wouldnt use such a feature (the 3d), but hey, its there for others if they want it. ive never really understood the hype behind 3d anyway.
i say let people wait until its cheaper, and then im sure it would be a great value card.
I believe anandtech did a test with pci-2.1 and there was no difference in gaming. In GPGPU calculations there was something like a 7-10% performance loss. Don't have the exact numbers in front of me though.
^Fanboy squeal amirite?
Anyway, although the performance is great on this card, I'm particularly interested in the cooling. I hope NvIDIA takes a leaf out of AMD's book and improves the cooling solutions on their future cards, as I'm not terribly interested in going back to AMD in the future (NVIDIA is just a more logical choice, considering its feature set and software support).
I look forward to a review of a 670 or 680 card (or equivalent, though I don't see them changing it).
My jaw drops at the thought of a 690 GPU though, I can only imagine how epic that card will be (performance and price wise XD).
Normally I would've gone for an Intel+nVidia build but to build it to the spec I would've wanted it would've cost me around £1000 atleast and I don't have that kinda money. AMD seems to have move to competing on price, hence why I've gone for an AMD build at a little over £500. However I've noticed alot of games are displaying nVidia logos on.
Granted I might not have explored every type of card on there but I'm going by what I've seen so far.