News Headlines
- Sat, May 18
- Assassin's Creed movie, starring Michael Fassbender, coming to theaters Memorial Day 2015
- Fri, May 17
- Dust: An Elysian Tail hitting PC May 24, the Blade of Ahrah and the power it controls awaits
- PC port of Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance confirmed, no release date given
- The Wonderful 101's not so wonderful release date announced, pushed to September 15
- Trion Worlds, developer for MMOs RIFT and Defiance, suffers heavy layoffs
New Articles
Related Articles
The Vapor-X starts off our benchmarks with some domination. The best Nvidia has right now, the dual-GPU GTX 295, which sold for $600 USD not that long ago, is just staying ahead by a small margin.


next: Devil May Cry 4 »

You're correct that using a wider interface costs more, partly because of the number of traces to the GPU. It's also difficult to connect so many traces for a wide interface to the smallest GPUs. AMD/ATI seem happy to stick with 256bit on their high end, and get sufficient bandwidth by using the fastest DDR5 (effectively twice the clock speed of GDDR3).
I'm not talking about the GPU RAM memory, I'm talking about "Interface Memory". It's in the 'bits' size range.
The 5870 has plenty of memory bandwidth for a single GPU, and 1GB handles most games at 2560x1600. Of course, 2GB models will follow in time, as will an X2 (2GPU) version.
That's the next gen boost for you TBH.
The problem with gaming benchmarks, especially comparing old and new gen, is that it doesn't take into account how much of an improvement it would bring, visually, it just goes by pure performance. THe 5870 is no slouch in the FPS category (usually beating everything but the 295), but the improvements, visually, are not taken into account in those tests.
BTW: Is it just me, or shouldn't the NEW generation of cards have more interface memory than the old? the BFG 295 has way more than any of the others? Granted, I don't really know what it's for, but it strikes me that if an older gen card can have so much, why can't a new one? More is better, I'd think, unless it provides no noticable benefit and increases the cost...